Idaho Passes Wins for Motorist Safety, Habitat Connectivity, and Public Lands

March 31, 2026

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 124 and Senate Joint Memorial 111 establish state priorities on conservation and federal public lands

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 124

On March 24, the Idaho legislature took official steps to acknowledge the importance of wildlife migration conservation and habitat connectivity for iconic species such as deer, elk, moose, and pronghorn, while also committing to making the state’s highways safer for motorists and wildlife alike. By conserving these habitats, Idaho can ensure future generations will be able to enjoy these herds and a multitude of other game and non-game species.

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 124 establishes a path to support investing in wildlife crossing infrastructure—underpasses, overpasses, and exclusionary fencing—to keep big game animals off the pavement. Idaho has roughly a thousand wildlife-vehicle collisions annually, and according to the Federal Highway Administration, the estimated cost of these accidents is roughly $150 million.

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 124 establishes a path to support investing in wildlife crossing infrastructure. (Carl Erquiaga)

Idaho’s resolution builds on decades of work by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Idaho Transportation Department, conservation groups, and other state and federal agencies to better understand and support wildlife migrations and address where wildlife corridors and highways intersect.

Big game migration conservation was emphasized in 2018 with Secretarial Order 3362. The order highlighted wildlife movement research and the conservation of migration habitat. The order also kickstarted several policy efforts such as NRCS’s Working Lands for Wildlife and the recently introduced Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act. But maybe the greatest success has been building highway crossing infrastructure to keep big animals off busy roadways.

In Idaho, that success can be seen through projects like the Cervidae Peak overpass on Highway 21 northeast of Boise. The first-of-its-kind overpass in Idaho ushers elk and deer over the highway, and officials predict the overpass will reduce collisions by 80 percent.

Cervidae isn’t the only example of wildlife crossing infrastructure in Idaho. In central Idaho’s Lemhi Valley, recently constructed fencing funnels big game animals under Highway 28. Although miles from the nearest peaks and forests, game cameras have caught not only routine use by deer and elk, but also a mountain goat avoiding the highway.

With the human population and development increasing in Idaho, this resolution couldn’t have passed at a better time as it is critical to protect motorists and conserve wildlife as our highways grow busier and habitat fragmentation continues.

Building highway crossing infrastructure helps keep big animals off busy roadways and increases motorist safety. (IDFG)

Senate Joint Memorial 111

Also on March 24, Idaho’s lawmakers passed Senate Joint Memorial 111 (SJM 111), declaring the legislature’s belief that federal public lands in Idaho should remain in public ownership.

Sponsored by Senator Treg Bernt (R-Meridian) and carried in the House by Representative Britt Raybould (R-Rexburg), SJM 111 affirms the importance of federal public lands to Idaho’s economy, wildlife, and way of life. The memorial emphasizes the value of these lands for grazing, timber, mining, and outdoor recreation, as well as traditional pursuits such as hunting, fishing, and trapping. It also calls on Congress to continue supporting critical funding sources for counties, wildfire response, shared stewardship agreements, and mutually beneficial land exchanges.

The memorial signals support for federal legislation to strengthen protections for public lands through the Public Lands in Public Hands Act (H.R. 718). H.R. 718 was introduced in Congress and is supported by a bipartisan group of Western legislators, including Idaho’s Representative Mike Simpson. The bill would require congressional approval for the sale of public lands that are more than 300 acres.

Thank you to the Idaho legislature for committing to public safety, wildlife habitat connectivity, and our state’s outdoor legacy through this resolution and memorial.

Learn more about TRCP’s work in the Pacific Northwest HERE.

Feature Image: IDFG

One Response to “Idaho Passes Wins for Motorist Safety, Habitat Connectivity, and Public Lands”

Marc Oliver April 3, 2026

Great news, we’re doing this in CO with fantastic results for both man and beast!

April 3, 2026 at 2:39 pm

Reply

Do you have any thoughts on this post?

Click here to cancel reply.

by: Zach Bodhane

posted in: Migration

March 26, 2026

The Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act Introduced in Senate

Legislation aims to codify highly successful USDA Migratory Big Game Initiative to enhance wildlife habitat connectivity on private and working lands

Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) have introduced the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act into the Senate. This bill would expand voluntary efforts to improve wildlife habitat, including big game migratory habitat, on working lands. This is now a bipartisan, bicameral effort, with the House version of this bill led by Representatives Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M) and Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.).

Building on the success of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Migratory Big Game Initiative (MBGI) in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho, the bill would codify USDA’s ability to leverage unique cost-share, technical assistance, and payments provided under the Grassland Conservation Reserve Program (GCRP) and Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) for the benefit of wildlife and agricultural producers.

The MBGI partnership has been both innovative and highly successful. In Wyoming, enrollment in conservation programs in priority corridors increased by 264% compared to before the partnership. However, the USDA is unlikely to expand this model nationwide unless the Farm Bill is updated as proposed in this legislation.

In addition, the bill will spur USDA research on virtual fencing technologies, which allow for greater wildlife movement and animal safety on livestock operations while enabling fine-scale grazing management for better fish and wildlife habitat. It also provides additional incentives through EQIP for the adoption of conservation practices that conserve or restore wildlife habitat connectivity.

“Working lands provide key habitat for migratory fish and wildlife, including big game like elk and mule deer. USDA’s voluntary conservation programs need to work together to support farmers and ranchers who create and enhance this habitat, and the next Farm Bill is our opportunity to make that happen,” said Joel Webster, chief conservation officer for TRCP. “The Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act removes unnecessary barriers to working lands stewardship and TRCP thanks Senator Heinrich and Senator Sheehy for their leadership on this bill.”

Learn more about Farm Bill conservation programs HERE.

Learn more about TRCP’s big game migration policy priorities HERE.

Photo Credit: Josh Metten

by: Tristan Henry

posted in: Migration

March 5, 2026

Oregon Legislature Passes Landmark “1.25 Percent for Wildlife” Act

After three legislative sessions and more than a decade of advocacy, a bipartisan coalition secures Oregon’s most significant conservation funding victory in a generation

Yesterday, the Oregon legislature passed HB 4134, the “1.25 Percent for Wildlife” act, which will generate approximately $38 million annually for fish, wildlife, and habitat conservation across the state. The bill now heads to Governor Kotek’s desk to be signed into law. The measure passed the Senate with bipartisan support after clearing the House on a 36–22 vote, marking the culmination of more than a decade of work by hunters, anglers, landowners, conservation organizations, and community leaders.

The legislation was championed by Representatives Ken Helm (D–Beaverton), Mark Owens (R–Crane), and Senator Todd Nash (R-Joseph) among others, who built bipartisan support across both chambers to advance the proposal.

“This is what happens when sportsmen and sportswomen, ranchers, conservation organizations, and community leaders refuse to give up,” said Tristan Henry, Oregon field representative for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership has worked to advance this funding in some form for three sessions now. Today, Oregonians reaffirmed our commitment to the fish, wildlife, and landscapes that define this state. Hunters and anglers have shouldered the financial load of conservation for over a century. This bill asks the broader public, and the visitors who come here to enjoy what we’ve helped build, to share in that investment.”

HB 4134 ensures that visitors contribute to sustaining the resources they come to Oregon to experience. (James Wicks)

Where the Money Comes From

HB 4134 increases Oregon’s statewide transient lodging tax by 1.25 percentage points, from 1.5 percent to 2.75 percent, beginning January 1, 2027. Oregon will remain among the lowest lodging tax states in the nation after the increase. Roughly two-thirds of the tax is paid by out-of-state visitors. For Oregonians, the cost amount rises to roughly $1.25 to $2.50 on an average overnight stay.

The new revenue is dedicated to nine clearly defined conservation and natural resource programs through predictable funding that does not depend on biennial budget negotiations or one-time General Fund deposits.

Where the Money Goes

The scale of this investment is best understood in context. ODFW’s entire biennial budget is approximately $562 million, funded primarily through a combination of hunting and fishing license revenue, federal grants, and limited General Fund support. Before this bill passed, the agency had zero dedicated funding for implementing Oregon’s State Wildlife Action Plan, the science-based blueprint that identifies 321 species of greatest conservation need and 11 habitat types requiring proactive restoration. One-time General Fund deposits of $10 million per biennium had been used in prior budget cycles, but those are phased out entirely in the current 2025–27 budget.

HB 4134 changes that picture. The largest allocation, approximately $27.4 million per year, flows to the newly renamed Recovering Oregon’s Wildlife Fund Subaccount to implement the State Wildlife Action Plan and Oregon Nearshore Strategy. allocating 0.9% of Oregon’s transient lodging revenue for habitat restoration, species recovery, and conservation strategy implementation. For an agency that has been forced to cut $1.3 million from anti-poaching campaigns, $1.9 million from fish research and monitoring, and $1.5 million from hatchery operations in recent budgets, this is not incremental. It is transformative. The remaining [approximate] $10.6 million per year is allocated across eight additional programs.

Oregon Conservation Corps (0.10% [of transient lodging revenue]): Stable funding for wildfire risk reduction, community resilience, and natural resources workforce development. This investment supports young Oregonians working in land management careers while building fire-adapted communities across the state.

ODFW Wildlife Connectivity Program (0.050%): Funding for wildlife crossing structures, passage improvements, and research to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions and reconnect fragmented habitats. Oregon’s highway system intersects critical migration corridors for elk, mule deer, and other species, and connectivity work is among the highest-return conservation investments available.

Oregon State Police Fish and Wildlife Division (0.050%): New resources for the troopers on the front lines against poaching, a persistent threat to Oregon’s fish and wildlife that directly undermines the work of hunters and anglers. ODFW’s most recent budget included a $600,000 cut to OSP enforcement funded by the agency. This allocation more than reverses that reduction and provides a durable funding base.

Wolf Management Compensation and Proactive Trust Fund (0.050%): Dedicated funding for livestock loss compensation, nonlethal deterrence tools, and conflict reduction programs. For ranching families in Eastern Oregon who have borne the costs of wolf recovery with limited and uncertain state support, this delivers on a long-standing commitment.

Oregon Conservation and Recreation Fund (0.050%): Community-based conservation and recreation grants that engage Oregonians in hands-on outdoor stewardship. This fund, established by the legislature in 2019 but chronically underfunded, will finally have a sustainable revenue source.

Wildlife Stewardship Program (0.020%): Support for wildlife rehabilitation facilities and stewardship priorities statewide.

Invasive Species Response (0.005%): Resources for detection, prevention, and removal of harmful invasive species that threaten native fish, wildlife, and habitat.

Department of Justice Anti-Poaching (0.010%): Stabilized capacity within DOJ to support prosecution of wildlife crimes.

The new revenue is dedicated to nine clearly defined conservation and natural resource programs through predictable funding that does not depend on biennial budget negotiations or one-time General Fund deposits. (Jim Davis)

A Decade in the Making

The passage of HB 4134 is the product of persistent, bipartisan advocacy that stretches back more than a decade. Representative Ken Helm (D-Beaverton) and Representative Mark Owens (R-Crane) have served as the bill’s chief sponsors, building support across party lines in both chambers. The concept was first introduced as a legislative concept and advanced in varying forms through prior sessions. The TRCP has worked to advance this funding mechanism for three consecutive legislative sessions, helping to build the hunting and fishing coalition that gave the bill credibility with lawmakers in both parties and from every corner of the state.

The broader coalition behind HB 4134 spans more than 60 organizations, from the Oregon Hunters Association and Backcountry Hunters & Anglers to Oregon Wild and the Nature Conservancy, from the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association to the League of Women Voters of Oregon. More than 2,000 pieces of public testimony were submitted during the legislative process, with over 84 percent in support. That breadth of support reflects a simple truth: Oregonians across the political spectrum understand that healthy fish, wildlife, and habitat are the foundation of the state’s identity, economy, and quality of life.

What This Means for Oregon

Oregon’s outdoor recreation economy generates $16 billion in consumer spending, supports 192,000 jobs, and accounts for 2.6 percent of the state’s GDP. Ninety percent of visitors come to Oregon to enjoy the state’s natural landscapes and wildlife. HB 4134 ensures that those visitors contribute to sustaining the resources they come here to experience.

For ODFW, this bill represents the most significant new funding stream in the agency’s modern history. The TRCP thanks the representatives and senators who supported this bill, the conservation organizations that engaged their members and provided testimony, and the thousands of Oregon hunters and anglers who sent emails, made phone calls, and championed this measure. For all this work, a brighter future for our hunting, fishing, ranching, and outdoor heritage has been secured.

Feature Image: James Wicks

The TRCP is your resource for all things conservation. In our weekly Roosevelt Report, you’ll receive the latest news on emerging habitat threats, legislation and proposals on the move, public land access solutions we’re spearheading, and opportunities for hunters and anglers to take action. Sign up now.

by: Dan Morgan

posted in: Migration

February 20, 2026

Why TRCP Works to Conserve America’s Special Places

TRCP works to conserve special places like the Boundary Waters and landscapes that define hunting and fishing. Here’s why.

“The nation behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value.” – Theodore Roosevelt

At the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, that idea is not a slogan. It is a responsibility.

Hunters and anglers know conservation is not abstract. It is a duck blind at sunrise, a bull elk crossing a high ridge, a trout rising in clean, cold water. It is also the rare chance to hunt, fish, and travel through landscapes where solitude is still possible—where distance, quiet, and undeveloped character shape the experience itself.

We believe in the wise use of natural resources. Responsible development strengthens communities and supports our economy and quality of life. But we also recognize that some landscapes are so ecologically intact, and so vital to fish, wildlife, and outdoor experiences, that their highest and best use is long-term stewardship.

Not every place meets that threshold and TRCP is judicious in where we engage. But where intact watersheds, big game habitat, resilient fisheries, and recreation depend on stability at scale—and where there is broad agreement among hunters and anglers—conservation is not symbolic. It is practical. It is how opportunity endures.

This is why TRCP works to conserve America’s special places. This principle guides our work from Alaska to Florida and in places like the Boundary Waters and the Brooks Range.

Following in Roosevelt’s Footsteps

Photo: Theodore Roosevelt Collection Harvard College Library

President Theodore Roosevelt believed conservation and prosperity belonged together. He hunted, he ranched, he fished, and he understood that wildlife abundance depends on intact habitat and clean water.

As T.R. wrote, “Conservation means development as much as it does protection.” Stewardship meant ensuring natural resources endure, productive and accessible, for generations to come. Yet Roosevelt also believed that some special places, by their very character, warranted enduring stewardship. That dual commitment of wise use and careful restraint where necessary, continues to guide TRCP’s work today.

Recently, Theodore Roosevelt’s direct descendants sent a letter to U.S. Senators urging them to uphold that legacy by protecting the Boundary Waters. They reminded lawmakers that Roosevelt worked “exceedingly hard to protect Minnesota’s forests and water,” emphasizing that safeguarding extraordinary landscapes reflects foresight, responsibility, and bipartisan leadership.

Their appeal was not nostalgic. It was a call to carry forward a distinctly American tradition of stewardship—recognizing that when certain waters, wildlife habitats, and public lands are placed at risk, leaders have a duty to act with the long view in mind.

For hunters and anglers, that long view is simple: intact habitat today means opportunity tomorrow.

Speak Up for the Boundary Waters

Why Special Places Matter to Hunters and Anglers

For hunters and anglers, special places are not abstract. They are the source of opportunity.

They are the cold headwaters that sustain trout. The migratory habitats that carry elk and mule deer across vast landscapes. The intact watersheds that support wild salmon and thriving waterfowl. They are also landscapes where Americans can escape the noise of everyday life and immerse themselves in nature – experiences afield that are increasingly rare and important in a busy world.

When systems are altered in ways that cannot be easily reversed, the impacts are not theoretical – they show up directly in fewer fish, displaced herds, and diminished experiences. When habitat fragments or water quality declines, opportunity declines with it.

This is why TRCP engages selectively and strategically in conserving nationally significant landscapes where habitat is irreplaceable and long-term sporting opportunity depends on stewardship.

When we step into the arena, we intend to make it count.

A Record of Stewardship – and a Responsibility to Continue

For more than two decades, TRCP has worked alongside hunters, anglers, landowners, and elected leaders from both parties to conserve landscapes that define American sporting opportunities.

In Wyoming’s Wyoming Range, we helped secure the withdrawal of 1.2 million acres of the Bridger-Teton National Forest from mineral entry, safeguarding critical habitat for one of North America’s most important mule deer herds. In Montana’s Rocky Mountain Front, we supported efforts to maintain the integrity of a landscape long valued for elk, native trout, and backcountry access. In Alaska’s Bristol Bay, we mobilized sportsmen and women to help sustain one of the world’s most productive wild salmon fisheries.

These efforts were not about opposing development everywhere. TRCP supports responsible development projects needed to benefit our economy, protect national security, and advance the interests of the United States, and we will work with decisionmakers and businesses to advance sensible projects. But certain landscapes—because of their ecological integrity, sporting value, and national significance, including the significant economic contributions they make through outdoor recreation and conservation investments —warrant durable safeguards.

That same principle guides our engagement in Alaska’s Brooks Range, one of North America’s last largely intact hunting and fishing landscapes. The very qualities that hunters and anglers value the most about the Brooks Range—the unbroken expansiveness, the lack of human activity, the unmatched solitude—are simply incompatible with a major industrial access corridor.

Across administrations and political shifts, TRCP has approached this work steadily and pragmatically, grounded in science and focused on lasting outcomes for fish, wildlife, and the sporting community.

The Boundary Waters: Stewardship in Practice

Photo: Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters

The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and the surrounding Rainy River watershed form one of the most intact freshwater systems in the country. These cold, connected waters sustain lake trout, walleye, and smallmouth bass, while the broader landscape supports moose, deer, and waterfowl—and it is all linked by more than 1,100 lakes and historic portage trails that allow people to experience this wildlife-rich landscape by canoe.

TRCP has engaged in this region with that responsibility in mind. In 2023, we joined several of our partners in celebrating the 20-year mineral withdrawal in the Rainy River watershed because of its national significance to hunting and fishing and the long-term risks sulfide-ore copper mining poses in such an interconnected system.

Our position has remained consistent: where development presents a high likelihood of irreversible harm to fisheries, recreation, and wildlife habitat—and where sporting interests broadly agree that conservation is needed – long-term stewardship is the prudent course.

The recent letter from Roosevelt’s descendants reinforces that tradition of foresight and bipartisan responsibility. Safeguarding places like the Boundary Waters reflects a continuation of America’s conservation ethic.

For hunters and anglers who believe stewardship requires participation, speaking up is part of that responsibility.

Take action through the Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters alert: Senate Resolution : Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters

Click here to sign up today.

by: Dan Morgan

posted in: Migration

February 12, 2026

TRCP Appreciates Make America Beautiful Again 250 Strategy and Migration Announcements

Efforts will continue progress on habitat, access, and big game migration corridor conservation

On Wednesday, February 12, the Make America Beautiful Again Commission announced its strategic initiative, MABA 250, which will be used to advance the administration’s conservation priorities, including voluntary land and water conservation, species recovery, and increased access for sportsmen and sportswomen.

“The MABA 250 strategy represents a clear opportunity to advance the interests of America’s 40 million hunters and anglers,” said Joel Webster, chief conservation officer for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “TRCP looks forward to working with the Make America Beautiful Commission to make this effort a success by securing conservation and access wins that benefit fish, wildlife, and the American people.”

Additionally, and directly related to the priorities of MABA 250, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation announced a request for proposals to fund projects that improve the quality of big game seasonal habitat, stopover areas, and migration corridors on federal land and/or voluntary efforts on private and Tribal land. These actions related to big game migration corridors reflect continued progress building on an approach established under the first Trump administration through Secretarial Order 3362, and one that also advances the priorities of the MABA Commission.

“We appreciate the continued leadership of the Trump administration to advance big game migration conservation,” continued Webster. “Hunters and anglers depend on healthy, connected habitats, and we look forward to building on today’s positive announcement through sustained coordination and investment that helps keep habitats connected for the future—and to protect the traditions that define our sporting heritage.”

Click here to sign up today.

Hunting & Fishing Access

MAPping Public Access

Unlocking Public Lands

Public Land Access

Brian Flynn, Two Wolf Foundation's Story

Key Issues for America’s Hunters

Chronic Wasting Disease