Marnee Banks

September 12, 2019

EPA Makes Final Move to Roll Back Clean Water Protections

Conservation groups rally together to voice support for fish and wildlife habitat, wetlands, and headwater streams

Conservation groups are opposing the Administration’s rollback of the 2015 Clean Water Rule, which was finalized today. The Administration’s action will leave roughly 50 percent of wetlands and 60 percent of stream miles across the country vulnerable to pollution and destruction. The 2015 Clean Water Rule had clarified longstanding Clean Water Act protections for millions of acres of wetlands and many headwater streams that protect communities from flooding, contribute to the drinking water supplies of one in three Americans, and provide essential fish and wildlife habitat that supports a robust outdoor recreation economy worth $887 billion.

“Sportsmen and women are outside every day experiencing the benefits of clean water,” says Whit Fosburgh, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “Rolling back these protections for wetlands and headwater streams threatens our hunting and fishing traditions and the outdoor economy that powers our communities.”

“No one wants to fish a lake covered in toxic algae, duck hunt in a bulldozed wetland, or pitch a tent next to a creek filled with feces,” says Collin O’Mara, president and CEO of the National Wildlife Federation. “Unfortunately, this Administration is working on multiple fronts to rewrite the rules that protect our waters, hoping no one will notice. The collective impact of these changes would be devastating for public health and wildlife across the country—and we will continue to fight to protect America’s waterways every step of the way.”

“Clean water is a basic right of every American,” says Chris Wood, president and CEO of Trout Unlimited. “To be effective, the Clean Water Act must be able to control pollution at its source. Unfortunately today’s action by the EPA places the health of 60 percent of the stream miles and the drinking water of one in three Americans at risk. Trout Unlimited will not rest, and will use all of the tools at our disposal, to compel EPA to reverse course on this misguided direction.”

“More than 100 million people across the US engage in fish- and wildlife-based recreation, approximately half of whom participate in fishing,” says Patrick Berry, president and CEO of Fly Fishers International. “It is clear the opportunities available to enjoy these outdoor pursuits is directly limited by the health of our natural systems and their ability to support healthy and abundant populations of fish and wildlife. Rolling back protections of wetlands, our lakes streams and rivers—some of the most diverse and productive wildlife habitats—not only compromises our natural heritage, but threatens the cultural and economic value of recreational fishing.”

“This rule will irreparably impact wetlands in America’s duck factory—the prairie pothole region—and threaten the health of riparian habitat critical for big game and 80 percent of all wildlife species,” says Land Tawney, president and CEO of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers. “Weakened protections translate to lost access and reduced opportunities for hunting and fishing. Hunters and anglers must not stand for shortsighted polices that compromise the integrity of fish and wildlife habitats that have been safeguarded for decades under the Clean Water Act.”

“EPA’s decision to repeal the Clean Water Rule is wholly unsupported by science, can’t be squared with the clear intent of the Clean Water Act, and fails the common sense test,” says Scott Kovarovics, Executive Director of Izaak Walton League of America. “To make matters worse, this is only a prelude to the second blow when EPA finalizes a new rule later this year that will further undermine protections for small streams, wetlands, and drinking water supplies across America.”

“The EPA is tossing out 50 years of peer-reviewed science and in doing so threatens to undermine the integrity of the Nation’s waters that support fish and wildlife,” says Doug Austen, executive director of the American Fisheries Society. “Allowing unchecked pollution and destruction in the waters and wetlands in the upper reaches of a watershed imperils the sustainability of fish stocks in both upstream and downstream waters and places valuable recreational fisheries and endangered species at risk.”

In a 2018 poll, 80 percent of sportsmen and women said Clean Water Act protections should apply to headwater streams and wetlands. Additionally, 92 percent believe that we should strengthen or maintain current clean water standards, not relax them.

More information about the proposed changes to the Clean Water Rule is available HERE.

29 Responses to “EPA Makes Final Move to Roll Back Clean Water Protections”

  1. Eric Hayes

    This is not a rollback of 50 years of work and science. This is a roll back of a 2015 policy that was a government over-reach that caused mass confusion for ranchers and land-owners. The quotes in this article are gross exaggerations and overly dramatic.

  2. Mixed Emotions on this one. The two facts that I am aware of; The EPA has been quite heavy handed on a lot of programs making access to wetlands difficult and costly. It is difficult to fault the administration but they may want to review the agency and the power it is given.

  3. Randy Slemmer

    I written many sportsmans organizations ,magazines, SCI etc. asking the logical question of why haven’t they taken a stand against trump and his corrupt administartion. It would appear that because he is backed by the nra he has become untouchable . I have been a conservationist thru hunting and owned guns for over 63 years. It is my sad belief that the nra and other far right organizations accompanied by trumps ignorance will be the reason that this kind of thing happens. I also believe that this position will get worse and losing safe water is the tip of the iceberg. Now I know I will either be ignored or blasted as a ‘LIB” but I have voted for more republicans in my life than democrats but the GOP has been turned into cowards by a bully. Just as the position on allowing any idiot to have guns is eroding the right to have guns this type of roll back on clean water will allow corruption in other areas. Will the sportsman organizations and hunters wake up, I don’t know but it better happen soon.

    • I too voted Republican for a long time. I now realize though, they only care what their donors want and trade in misinformation to accomplish it. Money in politics has a stranglehold on all republicans and corporate democrats and they have mortgaged our future and that of our kids/grandkids just to stay in power. I don’t agree with all their policies, but Bernie and any other progressive who wants to get the money out and establish term limits will get my vote this time. Maybe we can shock the establishment back to the reality that they must return to listening to their constituents.

  4. John M Kennedy, Jr.

    No rollback of 2015 Clean Water Rule. America should be entitled to CLEAN water in, creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, etc. My wife and I live in Las Cruces, NM. where there is rarely any water, but we love to travel wherever water is available, from the San Juan river to Alaskan rivers to Mn., the land of 10,000 lakes. If this thinking does not change, the present administration will be short lived. I am a conservative, and my message to the admin. Is, “Don’t piss off a conservative” when clean water is such a no brained!!

  5. Isn’t the “rollback” is nothing more than reverting to the pre-Obama standard for “waters of the United States”? If so, a little less hysteria and a little more objective analysis might be a good idea.

  6. Ken Hendricks

    The only environmental quality President Trump considers involves the size of the exhaust fan in his bathroom! He has sons who hunt. You need to work on contacting his sons, making a case, and possibly get his attention.

  7. Jeff Olson

    absolutely no data of what is going to be allowed to cause problems is quoted here, just generalities. It would be nice to see real data and not just a bunch of statements meant to draw an emotional response no matter what the actual facts are. Sounds like another liberal gloom and doom post to me full of fear mongering.

  8. Heidi Siegelbaum

    Anyone who cares about hunting, fishing, public lands and their children and grandchildren should care about this issue. I would lobby hard against this destructive dismantling of one of our earliest and most important landmark environmental protections (and what will be found illegal in litigation) . The hunting and fishing community have long been advocates for accessible and clean public lands. Thank you for your dedication and support.

  9. Christopher J Roach

    Its really sad that most people see all this in such a radical way. The division in this country between “left” and ” right” is disastrous. NONE of our politicians care what we want or think. What have the Republicans or Democrats done for any of us? Spend us into debt that will bind our grandchildren to servitude, waste our natural resources, kill our best and brightest young people in wars that go on forever? As sportsman and outdoor enthusiast we should do our research and come together with a plan of action. The Obama rule in 2015 did do some ridiculous stuff. Is repealing all of it the right thing to do? I contacted both my Senators in Az. They dont have a clue.

  10. Hugh Carola

    It is IMPERATIVE that Republican senators and members of Congress know exactly where we stand on this issue. Only they have any chance of reaching the Administration. If your Senator(s) and/or Member of Congress is a Republican, it’s on YOU to let them know – in no uncertain terms – that you oppose the Clean Water rollback and strongly urge them to stand up to this misguided and WRONG action by the White House. The 2015 WOTUS Rule was crafted only after years of painstaking work (including input from ALL stakeholders); to toss is aside like one tosses out a careless tweet is an insult to all American sportspersons – and everyone who cares about the natural world.

  11. scott schaeffer

    This administration has one common theme-ignore science and what’s best for the planet, and appeal only to the short term gains on wall street. Clean water and how watersheds operate has evaded most decisions Trump makes. Natural Resources, he feels, are an impediment to prosperity. We know, that they can play be a big part in our economy. I guess Mallards and other waterfowl, as usual-loose.

Do you have any thoughts on this post?

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Randall Williams

August 22, 2019

Colorado Sportsmen and Women Welcome Governor Polis’s Action for Wildlife

New executive order on migration corridors will help conserve big game herds and protect Colorado’s investment in wildlife

Sportsmen/women organizations today gathered in Idaho Springs to support Governor Jared Polis’ executive order to preserve historic migration corridors and winter ranges, along with family hunting and fishing traditions for future generations.

The order directs state departments to coordinate with federal, state, and local governments, private landowners, sportsmen and women, and others to protect wildlife through conservation of migration corridors. The long-term effort directs state departments to explore scientific mapping, historical information, and partnerships that will streamline habitat protection efforts.

Rapid growth in Colorado has created barriers and obstacles to migration corridors for bighorn sheep, mountain goats, moose, antelope, mule deer, elk, and even trout. The governor’s order allows departments to incorporate planning and public education and to use government resources more efficiently in order to both protect wildlife and prevent wildlife-vehicle traffic collisions in the future. Hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-related recreation opportunities are a large part of our healthy Colorado economy and generate more than $5 billion in annual economic output. Protecting wildlife corridors from development is good for sportsmen and our economy.

Gov. Polis’ executive order will ensure that growth in Colorado is balanced, while preserving our western sporting traditions.

Colorado sportsmen/women groups had high praise for Gov. Polis’ leadership:

“As someone who has hunted across the West, I am deeply appreciative of Governor Polis’ executive order. Protecting migration corridors protects our sporting traditions and the wildlife all Coloradans enjoy. This is a seminal moment in our state’s conservation history that will be celebrated for generations to come,” said Kassi Smith, Artemis Ambassador for Colorado, National Wildlife Federation.

“Trout Unlimited is thrilled to work with a governor so dedicated to protecting fish and wildlife. Gov. Polis’ innovative vision to dedicate funding and create partnerships to develop important wildlife migration routes and protect migration corridors and riparian areas crucial to wildlife health is lauded by sportsmen in Colorado,” said Scott Willoughby, Colorado coordinator for Trout Unlimited’s Sportsman’s Conservation Project.

“The vision and specific directives of this executive order will help spur collaboration between state and federal agencies, private landowners, non-profit organizations and other stakeholders so that Colorado’s irreplaceable big game migration corridors and winter range are maintained,” said Suzanne O’Neill, executive director of the Colorado Wildlife Federation.

“Migration corridors are essential for healthy herds and wildlife habitat. Since 2001, Colorado has lost more than half a million acres of habitat due to development and our growing population. Governor Polis’ executive order has given sportsmen and women a valuable tool to protect migration corridors, and BHA thanks the governor for his leadership on this issue,” said Don Holmstrom, co-chair of the Colorado chapter of the Backcountry Hunters & Anglers.

“Migration corridor conservation is a significant challenge facing our wildlife and hunting heritage, and Governor Polis’ executive order sets Colorado apart as a leader on this issue. Sportsmen and women appreciate the governor’s leadership, and we stand ready to work with state and federal agencies, landowners, and industry to ensure our big game herds can continue to access the seasonal habitats they need to thrive,” said Madeleine West, deputy director of Western lands for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.

 

Photo: floptical1 via Flickr

Andrew Wilkins

August 16, 2019

Four Conservation Priorities That Need Lawmakers’ Attention After Recess

When Congress returns from about a month spent with in-state constituents, the clock will be ticking on these spending bills and conservation policies we need to get across the finish line

You might be picturing lawmakers on a five-week vacation, but the annual August recess is time that senators and representatives spend meeting with their constituents and visiting with leaders in their communities. Ideally, they also find some time to enjoy the outdoors and experience what we all value so much as sportsmen and women.

Of course, we hope they’re thinking about the legislative to-do list for when they return in September, because the timeline grows short for several critical conservation items that must be addressed to benefit fish, wildlife, and habitat. Here’s what we need Congress to move on before the end of the year or, in some cases, within weeks of their return to Capitol Hill.

Settle Up on Spending

A familiar debate awaits when Congress returns to Washington: writing and passing all the required appropriations, or annual spending, bills. Now that both the House and Senate have reached a two-year, bipartisan budget deal they must pass appropriations bills for Fiscal Year 2020, which starts on October 1. This means that Congress must find a way to fund the government for the next year before the end of September, or they risk another government shutdown.

The House’s spending measures passed earlier this summer include landmark wins for conservation including strong investments in—and in some cases new funding for—Farm Bill conservation programs, the Land and Water Conservation Fund, chronic wasting disease surveillance and research, and critical infrastructure projects from the Everglades to the Front Range.

The ball is now in the Senate’s court to support conservation in their own appropriations bills and send it all to the president’s desk. What happens if they don’t? The government shuts down while they agree on a deal or lawmakers can give themselves an extension by passing what’s known as a continuing resolution. CRs keep money flowing at previously agreed upon funding levels, but they prevent new funding going to something like CWD research that has never been done before.

Pave the Road Ahead for the Highway Bill

Before leaving town, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee unanimously passed a new highway bill that includes a powerful new tool for conservation: a $250-million pilot program to construct wildlife crossings such as overpasses, underpasses, and culverts across the country over the next five years.

State departments of transportation, wildlife biologists, and conservationists have been urging Congress to provide dedicated funding for crossings to restore and improve habitat connectivity within migration corridors and reduce deadly wildlife-vehicle collisions where animals are often found crossing roads.

This also marks the first time that climate change language has been included in a highway bill. As written, the legislation creates a grant program called PROTECT to prioritize natural infrastructure solutions as roads and bridges are being planned, which would help to restore and improve ecosystem conditions around passenger roads.

All in all, senators on the committee have been trailblazers for conservation in the next iteration of the highway bill. Now, it’s on the House to get the job done.

In fact, the House can do even more for conservation in its forthcoming version of the bill by increasing funding for the Federal Lands Transportation Program, which supports the ongoing maintenance of passenger roads through public lands. Carrying on the chronic underfunding of U.S. Forest Service roads through FLTP will contribute to an already colossal deferred maintenance backlog on these important public lands.

Photo by Michigan DNR.
Modernize the Pittman-Robertson Act

The TRCP and our conservation partners have been leading the charge to update a vital source of funding for state fish and wildlife agency conservation efforts—the Pittman-Robertson Act. Right now, the fund created from excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment can’t be used to help recruit, retain, and reactivate (R3) hunters.

It’s time for that to change.

Congress has already updated the policy for fishing-related spending to give state agencies the ability to recruit new anglers. And this has likely helped to drive the recent bump in fishing participation and a more than 36-percent increase in spending on fishing equipment, which in turn creates an increase in funding for conservation.

It’s time for Congress to modernize Pittman-Robertson and allow similar outreach campaigns for hunters. Before the recess began, the Senate introduced S. 2092, a companion bill to the House’s H.R. 877. These bipartisan bills, aptly titled the Modernizing the Pittman-Robertson Fund for Tomorrow’s Needs Act, are essential to help fund, preserve, and grow our rich heritage of hunting.
Last Congress, a similar measure passed unanimously out of the House but did not make the end-of-year finish line. Now that the legislation has been introduced in both chambers, passage of this long-overdue legislation is a no-brainer. It’s a bipartisan success story waiting to happen.

Photo by US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Reviving These Fish Bills

From the Gulf to the Great Plains, there’s a lot happening this summer that affects our fisheries and the anglers who enjoy them, including pending legislation that deserves a vote without further delay.
The National Fish Habitat Through Partnerships Act—H.R. 1747 in the House and S. 754 in the Senate—would permanently authorize and provide funding for one of the nation’s best tools to protect and restore fish habitat across the nation. Comprised of 20 individual partnerships that advocate for regionally specific projects, this model has been effective for years but still limps from authorization to authorization, depending on the whims of Congress.

But legislation introduced in both chambers is vote-ready and can end this vicious cycle.

Another easy win would be passing legislation to conserve forage fish, which support all the sportfish we love to pursue. Numerous pressures, including changing ocean conditions and overfishing by commercial interests, have led to a decline in forage fish populations, which could shorten or even end recreational fishing seasons for the predators that rely on these baitfish.

Bipartisan legislation in the House, the Forage Fish Conservation Act (H.R. 2236), aims to ensure that forage fish remain in the marine food web by introducing a variety of commonsense, science-based provisions into existing management plans. These include creating a national, science-based definition for forage fish in federal waters, accounting for predator needs, assessing the impact of commercial fisheries on marine ecosystems before authorization, and requiring that managers consider forage fish when establishing research priorities.

Anglers are dependent on forage fish to keep our fisheries healthy and we are, in turn, depending on Congress to act now on this major conservation priority.

Image courtesy of National Parks.
A Challenging Timeline

Numerous conservation-wins-in-waiting are ready for congressional action once lawmakers return to Capitol Hill. Though the most pressing demand for legislators will be drafting and passing appropriations bills that strengthen our nation’s investment in conservation, we need to turn their attention to other measures that preserve wildlife, improve habitat connectivity, and ensure the future of our hunting traditions.

After the spending deadline has passed, the 2020 election will take a lot of the air out of the room, and we need to clinch these victories before that happens.

Randall Williams

August 14, 2019

New Mexicans: Support Hunting and Fishing on Our Public Lands

This is YOUR chance to play a role in how our public lands are managed and ensure that sportsmen and women have a say about the places where we love to hunt and fish

The Forest Service is revising its plans for the Carson and the Santa Fe National Forests that will determine the future management of more than 3 million acres of public land in northern New Mexico, including the world-class fisheries of the Rio Grande and Pecos Rivers. Sportsmen and women must get involved to ensure that the best habitats are conserved and public access for hunting and fishing is maintained.

Please attend a local public meeting in the next few weeks (see schedule below) and share your perspective as a public land user.

These events will offer updates on the planning process, allow the public to share their ideas and opinions on the draft plan, and explain ways for interested citizens to stay involved.

The best way to see that our priorities are included in the plans is to have a presence and provide input at these meetings. Meeting dates, locations, and times, as well as suggested talking points are listed below.

You can also comment on the Carson NF Plan here, and the Santa Fe NF Plan here.

Thank you for taking the time to support our public lands.

Suggested Talking Points:

  • Conservation of Big Game Migration Corridors and Seasonal Habitat: I request that the USFS take steps to ensure the conservation of identified big game migration corridors, winter and summer range. This should include not only conserving corridors that are known but have not been mapped and analyzed by New Mexico Department of Game & Fish, but also in ensuring that the Forest Plan Revision is able to conserve migration corridors that will be mapped in the future.
  • Public access: Public access is necessary for outdoor recreation. I encourage the USFS to identify opportunities to increase access to public lands that are landlocked or difficult to access because there are few or no access points across private land that enable the public to reach USFS lands.

 

Santa Fe National Forest Plan
(Read the plan here)
 Meeting Location  Date   Time  Location
 Santa Fe  Tuesday, Aug. 20  2 – 6pm  Santa Fe Community College (this is a joint meeting with the Santa Fe, Carson, and Cibola National Forests)
 Jemez Pueblo  Wednesday, Aug. 21  6 – 8pm  Pueblo of Jemez Welcome Center (back building; formerly Walatowa Visitor’s Center), 7413 Highway 4
 Buena Vista Thursday, Aug. 22  6 – 8pm  Buena Vista Fire Department
Pecos Monday, Aug. 26 6 – 8pm Pecos High School (Boardroom)
Gallina Tuesday, Sept. 3 6 – 8pm Gallina Elementary
Rio Rancho Wednesday, Sept. 4 6 – 8pm Rio Rancho Fire and Rescue, 5301 Santa Fe Hills Blvd.
Cuba Thursday, Sept. 5 6 – 8pm Sandoval County Fairgrounds- Community Building, 37 Rodeo Rd.
Las Vegas Tuesday, Sept. 10 6 – 8pm NM Highlands University (student union building, Rm 321)
Santa Fe Wednesday, Sept. 11 6 – 8pm Santa Fe NF Headquarters, 11 Forest Lane
Los Alamos Monday, Sept. 23 6 – 8pm Mesa Public Library
Abiquiu Wednesday, Sept. 25 6 – 8pm Ghost Ranch (lower pavillion), 280 Private Drive

 

 

Carson National Forest Plan
(Read the plan here)
 Meeting Location  Date   Time  Address
 Santa Fe Tuesday, Aug. 20  2 – 6pm  Santa Fe Community College (this is a joint meeting with the Santa Fe, Carson, and Cibola National Forests)
Taos Wednesday, Aug. 21 12 – 2pm Carson NF Supervisor’s Office
Buena Vista Thursday, Aug. 22 6 – 8pm Buena Vista Fire Department
Canjilon Wednesday, Aug. 28 5 -7pm Canjilon Community Center
El Rito Wednesday, Aug. 28 1 – 3pm El Rito Ranger District Office
Bloomfield Thursday, Aug. 29 1 – 3pm Jicarilla Ranger District Office
Farmington Thursday, Aug. 29 5 – 7pm San Juan College
Tres Piedras Friday, Aug. 30 1 – 3pm Tres Piedras Ranger District Office
Red River Tuesday, Sept. 3 5 – 7pm Red River Convention Center
Peñasco Wednesday, Sept. 4 1 – 3pm Camino Real Ranger District Office
Peñasco Tuesday, Sept. 10 5 – 7pm Camino Real Ranger District Office
Questa Wednesday, Sept. 11 1 – 3pm Questa Ranger District Office
Canjilon Thursday, Sept. 12 1 – 3pm Canjilon Ranger District Office
El Rito Thursday, Sept. 12 5 – 7pm Northern NM College
Taos Tuesday, Sept. 17 4 – 7pm Sagebrush Inn (this will be a facilitated, topic-driven workshop)
Abiquiu Thursday, Sept. 19 6 – 8pm Ghost Ranch (lower pavillion), 280 Private Drive

Ed Arnett

August 5, 2019

Forest Service Unveils Final Changes to Sage Grouse Conservation Plans

Amended plans for 5 million acres of sage grouse habitat follow a concerning trend

The U.S. Forest Service has released its final proposed amendments and records of decision for plans to conserve greater sage grouse habitat in Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado. The new plans replace forest plans from 2015, which helped to give the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confidence that the bird did not yet require listing as threatened or endangered.

While these state-specific plans maintain the basic framework of the originals, which were created through years of collaborative effort, there is concern that the new plans do not provide the same safeguards for certain sagebrush habitats. Priority habitat has been reduced and there is more potential for development and mineral extraction within sage grouse habitat in the new plans.

Similar changes were made to the Bureau of Land Management’s sage grouse conservation plans earlier this year.

“While perhaps not surprising, these changes are another mixed bag, with some addressing legitimate concerns from the states and others rolling back smart protections for core sage grouse habitat,” says Whit Fosburgh, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “Ultimately, we need federal land managers to commit to an approach that produces positive results for sage grouse habitat and populations. And we will continue working with the Forest Service, BLM, Western states, industry, and local partners to ensure that happens.”

The final plans identify and address potential environmental impacts for 19 national forest units with more than 5 million acres of potential greater sage grouse habitat. In this version, the strongest level of habitat protection given in the 2015 plans were weakened for more than 865,000 acres of sagebrush focal areas in Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming, and overall priority habitat management areas were reduced by about 160,000 acres.

General habitat management areas were removed altogether in Utah. While the original no-surface occupancy policy remains—meaning infrastructure for development cannot be built on priority habitat—the revised plans also give the Service and BLM more flexibility to waive these protections if they feel it’s necessary.

Unlike the BLM’s new stance on habitat mitigation, the Forest Service retained its compensatory mitigation requirements to offset the impacts of development in sage grouse habitat. However, for all states except Nevada, the plans shift the bottom-line goal for conservation away from a habitat gain to a no-net-loss standard.

This is really the least the agency can do to retain existing habitat, but it might not keep these birds off the endangered species list in the future, which was the goal when mitigation was included as a fundamental component of the 2015 plans. We can support better alignment with the states’ individual approaches to mitigation, but all habitat impacts must be mitigated and should also account for the future risk of losing the habitat.

The release of these new plans kicks off a 60-day objection period that will end October 1, 2019, and final decisions will be made by the Forest Service in December. At this point, it will be important for all federal agencies to move forward swiftly with implementation of these new plans to conserve sagebrush habitat and begin tracking the effectiveness of conservation measures.

Dr. Steve Williams, president of the Wildlife Management Institute and former director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, reminded us of this when the BLM plans were released: “The outcomes for sage grouse and sagebrush conservation and management must be legally defensible. If the agencies do not provide enough regulatory certainty, if there is too much flexibility leading to negative impacts on habitat, or if we find out later that actions were not effective, we will likely end up facing legal challenges deeper than those from the past. At that point, it’s difficult to see a future where sage grouse aren’t reconsidered for listing.”

HOW YOU CAN HELP

WHAT WILL FEWER HUNTERS MEAN FOR CONSERVATION?

The precipitous drop in hunter participation should be a call to action for all sportsmen and women, because it will have a significant ripple effect on key conservation funding models.

Learn More
Subscribe

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!