Chasing the Dark

Guest author Joe Jackson shares a steelheading story from the Situk River, a 19-mile waterway that drains a pair of lakes in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest. TRCP is working to ensure that conservation measures are being taken in the Tongass to ensure quality sporting opportunities, like catching steelhead in clean, cold water, is possible for future generations

These steelhead — Aashát, in the indigenous Tlingit tongue — have hatched from globules no bigger than a pea, survived perils ranging from mergansers to salmon sharks, and traveled hundreds if not thousands of miles under their own propulsion to be here. All I had to do was board a flight to southeast Alaska in early May.  

Boarding the flight to steelhead.

The Anchorage airport in May is full of fly rods. It’s not every person that’s got one, but it’s pretty close. Some of them strut like horses because they’re going on a fishing trip; others wander dejectedly, faces grim like they’ve just been diagnosed with stomach cancer, because they just got back. We all pass one another, at once anonymous yet joined in solemn union. We are the enlightened; the caste that knows steelhead exist, that this is their season. Occasionally we’ll nod at one another, acknowledging, but mostly it’s just a fleeting confluence of gazes and no-grins pleated over skulls that frenzy for the anadromous. 

Snatches of conversation in the terminal go like this: 

“Lost a thirty-eight incher in a logjam.”

“We tried soft eggs this year, don’t know if they helped.” 

“River was skinny as a meth-head while we were there. They’re gonna be gettin’ rain this week, though. Anybody headed there now ought to be in for a treat.” 

Steelhead, at least when you’re headed toward them, have the pleasing effect of most depressants. By that I mean you can board a plane and sit back and relax, and you really don’t care what happens around you so long as you get to a sea-run rainbow trout at the end of it. 

My friend Ryan, who would accompany me on this fishing adventure all the way from Missouri, met me in Juneau. Since there are only a couple of jets in and out of our destination per day, his flight from Seattle had to wait for the passengers of mine to flurry onboard before taking off. We snagged seats next to one another and chatted the way old friends do. It was the same old Ryan sitting there next to me; same reticence, same gladiator gleam in his eye that I’d seen those years ago as we chased cohos, trout, grayling together when he was living in Alaska – the gleam that suggested he wanted nothing more than to fish himself to death. The world changes and so does your life but fishing buddies rarely do.

We landed in a growing drizzle, the grandeur of mountains and ocean dulled by thick sheets of cloud. Gravel popped in the undercarriage of the rental car as we headed into the village. The upholstery smelled like rainforest.

The reason to travel for hours to a river.

Our destination was the Situk River, a 19-mile waterway that drains a pair of lakes in the northwest of Alaska’s Tongass National Forest. The Situk is a heavy-hitter for fisheries productivity, even by Alaskan standards. It receives runs of all five Pacific salmon species, as well as one of the highest (if not the highest) steelhead runs in the state. Every spring, an average of 7,000 steelhead make their way from the Gulf of Alaska to the Situk to spawn. As you’d imagine, it’s become a Mecca for steelhead enthusiasts like us.

Ryan and I fished for a couple hours and got a feel for the river, which, as those voices had suggested in the Anchorage airport, was rising steadily with the pounding rain. We weren’t alone out there. Nearly every pool was bestatued by a fisherman, some by two or three. We passed them all, nodding, muttering, seeking our own water. Eventually we found it and I managed to land a bright hen steelhead on an egg-sucking leech. She was maybe eight pounds and pretty as could be; the kind of fish that makes you sit back a little and think about what you’re doing, and maybe why.

I think one of the things about anadromous fish that so fascinates us is that they lead such big lives. Take a second to imagine it: a puny little steelhead fry wiggling around somewhere out there, no bigger than your little finger. In just a year or two they’ll swim out into the open ocean the same way a college kid finally says goodbye to Mom and Dad. They’ll head off into the world and if they return it means they’ve made it and that they’ve achieved everything and exactly what they were meant to. This is something humans rarely do, so, naturally, we envy the hell out of it. 

Someone’s first steelhead is a big deal. It ain’t like catching your first bluegill. Steelhead are said to be the fish of a thousand casts, and maybe that number is dampened a little in this place, but it’s still respectable.

All fish are, to some extent, sensitive to light. Steelhead especially. The very best time to catch one is right at or in close proximity to sunrise and sunset; just about when darkness either cedes authority or takes up the reins. You can catch them in the middle of the day, sure, but your chances are higher at low light. They feel safer, the water’s slightly cooler, and, ideally, they’ve forgotten most of the angler harassment they endured the day before. With sunrise being at something like five in the morning for that region of Alaska, Ryan and I knew we’d be in for some early wakeup calls. You want to chase the dark off the water, so to speak, so we planned to rise at three, get prepped, hike in, and be fishing through headlamps about as soon as civil twilight began. 

That first day was full of rain. Cold — startlingly cold — and clammy and relentless. Our souls huddled together in it, first as we strung up our rods and then as we hiked upstream, reminding ourselves that this was steelhead weather, and steelhead weather brings steelhead. Boots squelching through mud, the trail more of a suggestion. Waist deep in the stream. Logs smooth like mammoth tusks.

Morning passed. Ryan almost hooked a fish but didn’t.

Steelhead weather brings steelhead — steelhead weather brings steelhead —

Lunchtime. We struggled upriver, wallowing in snow that was up to our belly buttons, climbing like toddlers under downed trees. We knew the trail ended about two miles up from the bridge, and though this distance was academic on the map, it felt like forever out there. Finally we reached a pool that became our favorite; a starting point, a lunching spot, an ace-in-the-hole, a coffee break. Ryan managed to land his first steelhead there toward mid-afternoon, and though I almost bungled the net job, I didn’t. I guess it was a fish he was meant to have. 

Someone’s first steelhead is a big deal. It ain’t like catching your first bluegill. Steelhead are said to be the fish of a thousand casts, and maybe that number is dampened a little in this place, but it’s still respectable. Even if they’re the fish of five hundred casts, to catch one means that you’ve made those five hundred casts, and that you’ve made them in such a way as to be effective, and that you’ve braved the elements that steelhead find conducive to procreation and that you’ve outwitted a fish notorious for being supernaturally moody. A special occasion to be sure, and one to remember for a long time, probably forever. 

Many casts equal one steelhead.

We caught a few other nice steelhead that day before heading in at dusk. The fish weren’t all that big, but when you’re talking wild steelhead, you don’t complain. Back at the lodge we were filled with aches and the kind of bone-deep cold that only hot showers could take care of. We hung our waders and soggy rain jackets and knew we’d be sliding into them damp the next morning. 

Pretty soon we were tying more flies — black woolly buggers because we thought we’d figured out a pattern — and you could just see the old fire, reawakened, in Ryan’s eye. First steelhead. No goin’ back. By the time we called it quits it was pushing eleven o’clock. Alarms would sound four hours later. 

I had to envy Ryan’s passion. He was here to fish, and by God he was going to wring out every second of it that he could. Like all those stream miles we’d shared when he lived in Alaska. I laid there listening to his snoring, wondering if I had what it took to keep up with him; if I could do this for another five days, sun-up to sun-down; if I even cared enough.

 Just before sleep bagged me, though, I realized I didn’t have much of a choice. 

Steelhead mired our dreams at night, each one playing out to the ratcheting click of things unfurling; our reels, our minds.

We fought the river as it rose each day. Rain hammered us for the first couple, but it would relent occasionally and the clouds would part like curtains to reveal the sun and blue skies. We’d bask in these ephemeral heavens. We had fly rods in our hands, everything we could ever need on our backs, and more often than not we’d be staring down a jag of steelhead that were so big and numerous they looked like salmon. All of the world’s problems could be solved from right there. 

Fish to hand didn’t come easy — turns out our supposed theory about black woolly buggers was all wrong — but they weren’t impossible, either. 

Eventually — around day three or four, I think — the weather came to be dominated by partial sun rather than those wool-sock clouds that leaked rain. It was a welcome change. The river finally started dropping and I could hear the echoes of all those voices in the Anchorage airport:

Anyone headed there now will be in for a treat.

They weren’t talking about the surge of rain. Well, they were, but they were mostly talking about what would happen after it stopped. The river had been low and clear and not very conducive to steelhead movement for weeks leading up to our arrival. Then all of the sudden, the rain came and water levels rose and the stream temps dropped within the range that steelhead like to party in (somewhere between 39 and 42 degrees Fahrenheit). Now, with the atmospheric spigot turned off, the river would likely hover in the correct temperature range, while its levels would slowly drop and constrict steelhead to fishable water. In short, it was an ideal set of conditions, and our days somehow got longer and longer just trying to capitalize on our improbable luck. 

The second-to-last day is when things really started to happen.

Steelhead mired our dreams at night, each one playing out to the ratcheting click of things unfurling; our reels, our minds. We’d rise to the wails of alarms, eyes stinging, bones pleading, up into the moldy dark to the kitchen where we’d make the first pot of coffee, where we’d heat the burritos and scarf them down and move like arthritic dogs to load everything in the car. There we were in that slice of time, driving mindlessly to the gabble of radio, following headlamps that cut open the forest, wandering the river like mink. Chasing the dark just as hard as we could. 

The second-to-last day is when things really started to happen. We’d slowly worked out the fly patterns that caught fish, more or less. We also figured out things like where those fish would be holding, how to approach them, how long of a leader to use, and how much lead split-shot to crimp on.

Things began that day, like usual, at our pool. That sounds pretty casual as I write it, but in the moment I remember I was festering like a splinter. 

Every muscle ached and I was running on twelve hours of sleep for the last week. Little things irritated me at first and then infuriated me; how I was the only one with a net, how I always had to be the one to heat lunch, how Ryan would somehow crave the exact opposite of what I wanted. One second I’d want to fish a run carefully and off he’d go blasting downstream; the next he’d stop heron-still and cast to the same fish for an hour, maybe two, while I just wanted to see more of the river. 

Anyway, curmudgeon Joe was tampered a little after I’d caught a nice steelhead on a Copper John nymph that morning. One that I’d tied for grayling fishing. Then about ten o’clock Ryan hooked a fish and, in the commotion, an absolute whopper of a steelhead sidled out from under a log to see what was happening. He took on my first cast, and for the first time all week, we were doubled up. Ryan got his netted in short order, but mine was big enough that I couldn’t do a whole lot right away. We danced in a stalemate for a while; the fish trying to bulldog back under the log, me walking the tightrope of just enough pressure to keep him out but not enough to snap the tippet. Just when I thought I had him, and I went to scoop the net under him — Ryan was holding his fish in the water on the gravel bar — he took off and the angle was all wrong and the hook popped out. Kapow.  

Well — that blew a fuse. I had all of a million accusations to throw at the world, at Ryan, but in the end it came right down to my own fault. I’d gotten caught up in the hype; I wanted a steelhead double to snap a photo of for my article. Of course you don’t see that when the blood’s running thick through your eyes, though. 

We fished downstream like we did any other day. I was moving fast just wanting it to be over. I’d put big stretches between Ryan and I; sometimes a couple hundred yards, sometimes farther. Later in the afternoon, Ryan hooked a fish way upstream and when I heard his shout I could’ve killed him. Just call it a day, for Pete’s sake. I had an article to write and I couldn’t do it following his lunatic ass up and down the river. And hell — I hooked that behemoth a half hour ago and where was he with the net? I hoofed it upstream for something like a quarter mile before I finally got to him. 

It’s a horrible thing to say now, but I wished that fish would just snap him off. Give him a taste of that ugly plummeting feeling; make it so I wasn’t the only one. But that didn’t happen. He got the fish in a spot where I could net it, so I did, and he whooped like he always did, like a kid who just won a baseball trophy. 

Same old Ryan.

Finally, near dark, things went my way. I cast a pink stonefly that I tied in my classroom all those months ago to a coin-slot of fast water. A bright hen steelhead obliged the cast and stuff happened like it’s supposed to and Ryan netted her. It turned out to be the longest fish we’d seen thus far, and one that threw me from despondency to euphoria. 

“…from despondency to euphoria.” 

You lose a fish and you might as well kill yourself, then a half hour later you land one and the world is yours, there in the palm of your hand like a seed. This is what those faces in the airport know, the glowing and the forsaken. Those heading home and those leaving it. They know what it is to chase steelhead and to play with fire. They know how it all tends to shake things loose inside you.

The fish lay panting in the net and we both stared. Then Ryan grinned from ear to ear and held out his fist. I knocked it with my own. My knuckles said something along the lines of, “I’m sorry for being a butthead earlier, and I’m actually enjoying the hell out of life right now,” so that my mouth didn’t have to. 

Same old Ryan. The world changes but fishing buddies rarely do. Thank God.


Joe and Ryan caught these steelhead in southeast Alaska in rivers flowing out of the iconic Tongass rainforest. TRCP is working to ensure that conservation measures are being taken in the Tongass to guarantee quality fishing opportunities like catching steelhead in clean, cold water is possible for future generations. If you want more information on conservation opportunities in Alaska, sign up for our newsletter HERE.

This is an excerpt from Joe Jackson’s outdoor memoir, Chasing The Dark, published in August 2024 by Epicenter Press. You can find more of Joe’s work at josephdjacksonwriter.com.

Do you have any thoughts on this post?

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments must be under 1000 characters.

May 30, 2025

Hispanic Leaders Bring the Southwest to Washington, D.C.

The TRCP organized a spring advocacy trip to demonstrate the power of unity, outdoor traditions, and a bipartisan approach to conservation.

This spring, the heart of the Southwest made its way to the halls of power in Washington, D.C., as Hispanic leaders united to speak up for the lands and waters that shape their culture, outdoor traditions, and futures. As part of HECHO’s (Hispanics Enjoying Camping, Hunting, and the Outdoors) 2025 spring advocacy trip, members of the Hispanic Conservation Leadership Council (HCLC) brought their voices and stories directly to lawmakers, urging protection and conservation of public lands. 

From the vibrant canyons of Arizona to the sacred rivers of New Mexico, the Southwest is home to some of the nation’s most treasured public lands. For the Hispanic leaders who made the journey to D.C., these lands are more than scenic beauty—they’re economic drivers and places of personal and communal connection. Hunting and fishing on these lands not only sustains time-honored traditions but also supports local economies and fosters the next generation of conservation and stewardship. 

The advocacy trip amplified these outdoor traditions, with participants ranging from business owners and elected officials to conservationists and community advocates. Their unified message? Public lands must remain public, accessible, and protected. 

In conversations with members of Congress and key decision-makers, the HCLC emphasized the importance of protecting areas like the Grand Canyon watershed, addressing forest health and catastrophic wildfire, funding for proactive management of federal lands, and protecting critical water resources in the region. In addition, both TRCP and HCLC members also touched on the importance of maintaining robust federal funding to address ongoing drought conditions in the Colorado River Basin, including investments in fish and wildlife habitat restoration efforts that build resilience to shrinking water supplies.  

The TRCP and HCLC highlighted support for the bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act and the need to increase the pace and scale of active forest management approaches that also benefit fish and wildlife valued by hunters and anglers. These issues are not partisan—they are universal, touching on clean water, natural disaster mitigation, recreation, cultural preservation, and economic sustainability. 

One recurring theme throughout the trip was the need for balance—between use and conservation, between progress and preservation. As one participant shared, “I’m not against using our public lands… but we have to monitor that to where we don’t deplete our resources.” The goal isn’t to halt development, but to ensure it doesn’t come at the cost of future generations. 

From forest management and fire prevention to watershed protection and outdoor recreation, the issues discussed were grounded in the everyday realities of communities that rely on these lands. 

Perhaps the most powerful element of the trip was the unity among the participants. Despite different roles, regions, and backgrounds, the group stood together with a shared sense of purpose and pride. As one leader expressed, “We need to stand up proud as Hispanos… This is part of us. It’s querencia, a deep love and connection to the land.” 

The HECHO 2025 spring advocacy trip was a testament to the power of representation and grass tops leadership. These leaders shared their personal stories, cultural ties, and community priorities directly with policymakers—demonstrating the power of unity, outdoor traditions, and bipartisan approach to conservation.  

Learn more about TRCP’s commitment to habitat and clean water here


The TRCP is your resource for all things conservation. In our weekly Roosevelt Report, you’ll receive the latest news on emerging habitat threats, legislation and proposals on the move, public land access solutions we’re spearheading, and opportunities for hunters and anglers to take action. Sign up now.

May 23, 2025

Tracking the Budget Bill: What Hunters and Anglers Need to Know

An overview of the budget reconciliation bill and its implications for public lands, access, and conservation.

On Wednesday night, the House passed—by a 215-214 vote—the budget reconciliation bill (H.R. 1) that would advance President Trump’s fiscal and domestic policy agenda. For months, Congressional Republicans have been developing the package to implement the party’s agenda, with an emphasis on cutting government spending and generating additional revenue to reauthorize and extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, along with defense and immigration related spending.  Now heading to the Senate, the bill is titled the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” 

As hunters, anglers, and conservationists cheer the decision by lawmakers to remove an amendment to the House budget reconciliation bill that would have sold off some public lands in Nevada and Utah, it’s important to note that this massive reconciliation bill also contains several other provisions added by the House Committee on Natural Resources that could impact fish and wildlife habitat and public access.  

Here’s what you need to know about what stayed in, and what fell out of the Natural Resources portion of the House reconciliation bill:



Removed: Public Land Sales in NV and UT

An amendment successfully added to the bill during the HNRC markup would have authorized the sale of about 500,000 acres of federal public land across Nevada and Utah. Proponents of the amendment argue that the measure was needed to generate revenue and facilitate housing and local infrastructure development. By pursuing this through budget reconciliation, these lands would have been sold without a transparent public process and funds generated would not have been reinvested in conservation and access. 

Hunters and anglers spoke up and made it clear to members of Congress that reconciliation is not the proper place for land sale discussions. Several House Republicans, including Montana Representatives Ryan Zinke and Troy Downing and Idaho Representative Mike Simpson, vocally opposed language that would sell or swap large scale swaths of public lands. 

Prior to moving to a floor vote, House leadership and HNRC leadership removed the amendment from the bill, lifting any sale of public land from the House bill. The move is a major win for the hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation community, and TRPC will stay vigilant to get in front of any potential land sale provisions that could emerge from the Senate. Meanwhile, we will continue to work with members of Congress to develop long-term solutions to land management challenges faced in Western communities  

Removed: Forced Development of the Ambler Industrial Road in Alaska’s Brooks Range

In addition to removing provisions that would sell public land, House leadership removed the section of the bill that would have forced development of the proposed Ambler Industrial Road in Alaska’s Brooks Range.  

The Ambler Road would cut directly across hundreds of miles of our nation’s most wild and remote hunting and fishing grounds. The fish and wildlife resources in this vast region – including one of the largest remaining caribou herds in North America and world-renowned sheefish fisheries – support 66 rural communities as well as a collective of guides, outfitters, transporters, air taxi services, and other small businesses.  The proposed 211-mile Ambler Industrial Road would require nearly 3,000 stream crossings and span 11 major rivers, threatening fisheries, subsistence resources, and the region’s outdoor economy. 

By pursuing the Ambler Road permit through budget reconciliation, this impactful decision could have advanced without a transparent public process. In every opportunity for public comment on the proposed Ambler Industrial Road, the hunting and fishing community has stood up and spoken out against this project that risks the wild and remote qualities of the Brooks Range. The TRCP is a member of the Hunters & Anglers for the Brooks Range, a coalition of 65 groups and brands including impacted local businesses and 19,400 individuals engaged in maintaining a wild Brooks Range. We are encouraged by the removal of this provision from the House-passed bill and will remain engaged to prevent and oppose any efforts to insert similar language in the Senate reconciliation package.  

Still in play: Boundary Waters Mining Leases

A provision of the Committee-approved bill would reinstate leases for Twin Metals Minnesota, a subsidiary of the Chilean corporation, Antofagasta PLC, to conduct copper-nickel sulfide mining activities directly upstream from the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Superior National Forest, threatening fish, wildlife, and water quality in the country’s most visited wilderness area.  

Each year, thousands of hunters and anglers visit the Boundary Waters, which contains over 2,000 pristine, interconnected lakes and supports large populations of loons, moose, walleye, trout, deer, ruffed grouse, fishers, beavers, sturgeon, and more. However, these species, this ecosystem, and the local economy are put at risk by sulfide mining drainage that increases acidity and leaches toxic metals in the watershed, endangering water quality and aquatic life.    

This provision was retained in the House-passed H.R. 1. TRCP will work to see that it is removed from the final bill, most likely in the Senate where it could be removed by the Senate parliamentarian under the Byrd Rule.     

Removed: Roll Back of BLM Resource Management Plans

House leadership also removed policy language that would have prohibited the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from implementing, administering, or enforcing the following public land Resource Management Plans (RMPs):  

  • Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming  
  • Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming  
  • Miles City Field Office, Montana  
  • North Dakota  
  • Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office, Colorado 

These plans are the product of extensive public engagement, and in some cases, state and locally driven negotiations among the variety of interests that are supported by multiple-use BLM lands. They also in some cases are updating management plans that are decades old.  

The TRCP is encouraged by the removal of this proposal and further emphasizes that the Bureau of Land Management has many administrative tools available to improve implementation of completed land use plans and has the discretion to surgically amend or revise those plans, which is preferrable to sweeping legislative action.    

Now heading to the Senate, the bill is titled the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The Senate may opt to draft their own competing reconciliation bill. If so, the two products would eventually need to be combined via conference or be passed again through both chambers. The TRCP is closely monitoring this bill and will ensure that hunters and anglers have a seat at the table to speak for conservation and access.  We remain committed to helping hunters and anglers understand and engage in the process to maintain fish and wildlife habitat, and public access.  

In the face of gridlock, conservation is, and should be, a shared priority regardless of party affiliation or ideology. TRCP is your resource for all things conservation. In our weekly Roosevelt Report, you’ll receive the latest news on budget reconciliation as well as emerging habitat threats, legislation and proposals on the move, public land access solutions we’re spearheading, and opportunities for hunters and anglers to take action. Sign up now


Hunters and anglers have always been the unsung heroes of conservation in America, quietly paying it forward every time we buy a license, a box of ammo, or a tank of boat fuel. We know you’re not satisfied with simply going hunting or fishing and then going home—so go the extra distance. You can take action on the conservation issues that matter right now. Click here to get started.

May 22, 2025

TRCP Applauds Removal of Public Land Sales from the Budget Reconciliation Bill

Organization objects to the large-scale transfer or sale of public lands and thanks lawmakers for listening to hunt-fish values

Today, hunters, anglers, conservationists, and all Americans who value our nation’s public lands cheer the decision to remove an amendment from the House budget reconciliation bill that would have sold off some public lands in Nevada and Utah without public input or consideration for impacts to public access.

Several House and Senate Republicans, including Montana Representatives Ryan Zinke and Troy Downing and Idaho Representative Mike Simpson, have vocally opposed any language that would sell or swap large-scale swaths of public lands. Some proponents of public land sales during this process have asserted that the sale of public lands is necessary to develop more affordable housing in Western communities. The TRCP agrees that there is room for discussion around how to facilitate small, purposeful exchanges and disposals that may facilitate affordable housing or other uses that are in the public interest. However, by pursuing this through budget reconciliation, these lands would have been sold without a transparent public process and funds generated would not have been reinvested in conservation and access. There are well-established criteria and processes for disposing of public lands, and the removal of the amendment reaffirms that budget reconciliation legislation is not the proper venue for such decisions.

“The TRCP is encouraged to see provisions removed from the House budget reconciliation bill that would sell off public lands. Hunters and anglers stepped into the arena to make their voices heard, and members of Congress listened—thank you,” said Joel Pedersen, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “In particular, we thank Congressmen Zinke, Downing, and Simpson for their strident advocacy on behalf of America’s hunters, anglers, and outdoor recreationists. We also appreciate the efforts of the House Natural Resources Committee and House leadership on their role in an outcome that maintains the public’s ability to weigh in on actions affecting our public lands. We remain committed to working with lawmakers to resolve challenges with public lands management and to find solutions that are in the public interest.”

In addition to removing provisions that would sell off public land, House leadership also removed the section of the bill that would have forced development of the proposed Ambler Industrial Road in Alaska’s Brooks Range, which would cut directly across hundreds of miles of our nation’s most wild and remote hunting and fishing grounds. By pursuing the Ambler Industrial Road permit in budget reconciliation, this impactful decision could have advanced without a transparent public process. In every opportunity for public comment on the proposed Ambler Industrial Road, the hunting and fishing community has stood up and spoken out against this project that risks the wild and remote qualities of the Brooks Range. The TRCP is a member of the Hunters & Anglers for the Brooks Range, a coalition of 65 groups and brands including impacted local businesses and 19,400 individuals engaged in maintaining a wild Brooks Range.

America’s 640 million acres of national public lands—including our National Forests and Bureau of Land Management lands—are the setting for irreplaceable hunting and fishing access to millions of Americans. Many of the best trout and salmon rivers originate on federal lands, and these public landscapes provide intact habitat that is essential for the long-term survival of big game species. Federally managed public lands are the backbone of America’s outdoor recreation industry, which contributed $639.5 billion to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2023.

There are many complex challenges to managing millions of acres of federal public lands for multiple uses that result in areas of disagreement. Collaboration, as it has been for decades, is the way toward successful and lasting multiple-use management for industries, wildlife, and public hunting and fishing access. TRCP is committed to being a part of that better way forward. When we unite, we win.

Learn more about the risks of public land sales HERE.


The TRCP is your resource for all things conservation. In our weekly Roosevelt Report, you’ll receive the latest news on emerging habitat threats, legislation and proposals on the move, public land access solutions we’re spearheading, and opportunities for hunters and anglers to take action. Sign up now.

May 16, 2025

What Hunters and Anglers Need to Know About Budget Reconciliation

An overview of the budget reconciliation process and its implications for public lands, access, and conservation.

Last week, the House Committee on Natural Resources (HNRC) approved its portion of an emerging budget reconciliation package. For months, Congressional Republicans have been developing the package to implement the party’s domestic policy agenda, with an emphasis on cutting government spending and generating additional revenue to reauthorize and extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, along with defense and immigration related spending. 

According to HNRC Chair Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.), the natural resources portion of the budget reconciliation package will generate an estimated $18.5 billion in revenue and savings by mandating increased oil, gas, coal, and leases on public lands; reducing environmental regulations; and including a last-minute amendment to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands in Utah and Nevada.  

The TRCP has been tracking budget reconciliation legislation and remains committed to helping hunters and anglers understand and engage in the process to maintain fish and wildlife habitat, public access and public commenting opportunities.  

Here’s what you need to know about the package, how it is developing as it moves through Congress, and how it will impact hunting and fishing across the country. 

In 1974, Congress passed the Congressional Budget Act. This Act conveys the authority to set and enforce spending and revenue blueprints through a process called budget reconciliation. Under this process, Congress adopts a concurrent resolution that instructs House and Senate committees to meet assigned budget targets. Committees then develop legislation according to these directives, and the legislation from each committee is combined into a “budget reconciliation bill.” 

In statute, budget reconciliation bills are restricted by the Byrd Rule, which prevents the inclusion of policy provisions that don’t change the level of spending or revenues, or that only create “merely incidental” changes to spending or revenues. The rule also prevents provisions that increase deficits beyond the “reconciliation window,” which typically lasts ten years.  

Despite these restrictions, reconciliation bills are often looked at as potential vehicles to advance politically controversial provisions because this type of legislation carries special status in the Senate. Whereas most legislation requires 60 votes in the Senate to avoid a filibuster, budget reconciliation bills are considered under expedited procedures and allow passage with only a simple majority of 51. As a result, the reconciliation process has been used as the vehicle for several landmark packages when one party controls both chambers of Congress and the White House, such as President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and President Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act and Inflation Reduction Act. 

The House and Senate passed a concurrent budget resolution on April 10, establishing spending and revenue targets for each committee. Because the reconciliation package includes tax provisions, the House is responsible for initiating legislation, which has begun to emerge from the committee process. The Committee on Natural Resources is the eighth committee to mark up and approve its reconciliation legislation.  

Earlier today, each committee’s recommendations were set to be approved by the House Budget Committee. However, the reconciliation text was ultimately rejected on a 16-21 vote over objections from the several Republican members. They opposed the current version of the bill due to their concerns that the bill does not cut spending far enough. The Budget Committee will work through the weekend to resolve these issues and will likely look to vote again early next week. If approved by the Budget Committee, the bill will then be sent to the House floor following another potential set of amendments in the House Rules Committee, where it can be passed with a simple majority. 

Committees in the Senate may opt to create their own versions that differ from the House, although the Senate is allowed to pass the House version without doing so. Once the Senate version reaches the floor for consideration, senators can use a point of order to reject provisions which they believe violate the Byrd Rule. The Senate Parliamentarian, a nonpartisan officer, will rule on whether each questioned provision is in violation of the rule, a ruling that can be waived with a sixty-vote majority. Republicans currently have 53 senators, meaning that provisions likely must remain within the boundaries of the Byrd Rule to pass. After this process concludes, the full Senate version can pass with only a simple majority. 

After both bodies pass reconciliation legislation, the Senate and House must align their bills, either through a joint conference committee or through the exchange of amendments. The compromise version must again pass both the House and Senate before being signed by the President. House Republicans aim to complete this process by Memorial Day, but some Senate Republicans note that negotiations could take longer. 

Republicans are currently planning to address the debt limit through the budget reconciliation process. The Treasury Department recently announced that the “X Date” (the date by when the U.S. Government would default on its debt) will likely come some time in August. This means that Congress must act before then to increase or suspend the debt limit, placing a definitive deadline for reconciliation bills for as long as they remain linked with the debt limit.  

Public Land Sales in NV and UT 

An amendment successfully added to the bill would authorize the sale of roughly 460,000 acres of federal public land across Nevada and Utah. Given the nature of the amendment text, it is difficult to analyze exactly how many acres would be for sale. However, in Nevada, it’s estimated that the amendment would order the sale of 65,000 acres in Clark County, 16,000 acres in Washoe County, 12,000 acres in Lyon County, and 350,000 acres in Pershing County (including land exchanges); in addition to 11,000 acres across almost 70 parcels in Utah. Proponents of the amendment argue that the measure will generate revenue and facilitate housing and local infrastructure development.  

Following months of advocacy from hunters, anglers, and outdoor recreationists, the HNRC-released text originally omitted any provisions related to public land sales. The amendment was introduced late in the markup following more than 12 hours of debate. In addition to forcing land sales, the amendment also skirts the usual process of public input into any proposed land sales and fails to direct revenues from Bureau of Land Management land sales for the purchase of public access or habitat—the amendment would instead send revenues directly to the general treasury for other purposes.  

The TRCP agrees that there is room for discussion around how to facilitate small, purposeful exchanges and disposals that may facilitate affordable housing or other uses that are in the public interest and supported by impacted, local interests. We are willing to work in good faith to address challenges that communities adjacent to federal lands may face. But our stance on this approach is clear: it is the wrong approach to force this sale through a partisan budget reconciliation process in Congress that eliminates opportunities for public engagement and in a fashion that would NOT deposit any revenues from land sales back into conservation and access (as would be done through a different process).  

“There are well-established criteria and processes for disposing of public lands, and reconciliation legislation is not the proper venue for such decisions,” said Joel Pedersen, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “Any proposed sale of public lands must involve a transparent public process, all transactions should serve the public interest, and proceeds should be reinvested in new public land access and habitat conservation.” 

Boundary Waters Conservation 

A provision of the Committee-approved bill would reinstate leases for Twin Metals Minnesota, a subsidiary of the Chilean corporation, Antofagasta PLC, to conduct copper-nickel sulfide mining activities directly upstream form the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Superior National Forest, threatening fish, wildlife, and water quality in the country’s most visited wilderness area. 

Each year, thousands of hunters and anglers visit the Boundary Waters, which contains over 2,000 pristine, interconnected lakes and supports large populations of loons, moose, walleye, trout, deer, ruffed grouse, fishers, beavers, sturgeons, and more. However, these species, this ecosystem, and the local economy are put at risk by sulfide mining drainage that increases acidity and leaches toxic metals in the watershed, endangering water quality and aquatic life.   

The TRCP is a partner organization of Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters, which opposes the Twin Metals mine.

Ambler Road Development 

The bill would require the Department of the Interior to issue permits, licenses, leases, and certificates to allow the construction of the Ambler Industrial Road. This road cuts directly across Alaska’s Brooks Range, which covers our nation’s most wild and remote hunting and fishing grounds. The fish and wildlife resources in this vast region – including one of the largest remaining caribou herds in North America and world-renowned sheefish fisheries – support 66 rural communities as well as a collective of guides, outfitters, transporters, air taxi services, and other small businesses.  

The proposed 211-mile Ambler Industrial Road would require nearly 3,000 stream crossings and span 11 major rivers, threatening fisheries, subsistence resources, and the region’s outdoor economy. The bill establishes a fixed annual rental fee of $500,000 for the road’s right-of-way from fiscal years 2025 through 2034.  

Further, the Ambler industrial mining road would not strengthen U.S. supply chains of critical minerals, but it could strengthen the supply chains of our adversaries.The road would facilitate the sale of Alaska’s mineral resources to foreign processors largely in southeast Asia and China. The TRCP is a member of the Hunters & Anglers for the Brooks Range, a coalition of over 14,000 individuals and 65 groups and brands, that opposes the Ambler Industrial Road.   

Rolling Back BLM Resource Management Plans 

If the House bill were to become law, policy language included would prohibit the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from implementing, administering, or enforcing the following Records of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plans (RMPs): 

  • Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming 
  • Buffalo Field Office, Wyoming 
  • Miles City Field Office, Montana 
  • North Dakota 
  • Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office 

These plans are the product of extensive public engagement, and in some cases, state and locally driven negotiations among the variety of interests that are supported by multiple-use BLM lands. They also in some cases are updating management plans that are decades old. Hunters and anglers did not get everything that we wanted in these plans, nor did other interests at the table. If members of Congress have concerns about the content of these plans, the Bureau of Land Management has many administrative tools available to improve implementation of completed land use plans and has the discretion to surgically amend or revise those plans, which is preferrable to sweeping legislative action.   

Mandating Lease Sales for Oil, Gas, Mineral, and Coal on Public Lands 

Multiple provisions would mandate lease sales for oil, gas, mineral, and coal extraction on public lands. These include at least four lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; quarterly onshore oil and gas lease sales in Wyoming, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Nevada, and Alaska; at least 30 offshore lease sales in the Gulf; at least six lease sales in Cook Inlet, Alaska; and lease sales every other year in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 

Additionally, the legislation mandates that the Department of the Interior make available at least 4,000,000 acres of federal public lands for leases on known coal reserves. It also lowers the royalty rates paid to the government by developers for oil and gas extraction, which some argue will spur new lease sales and thereby increased revenue. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 increased the minimum royalty rate from 12.5% to 16.67%, so this action would undo that increase. Even at the higher rate, oil and gas royalties for production on federal land are still much lower than on most non-federal lands, such as private lands and state trust lands.   

National Environmental Policy Act Process Changes 

Certain permitting reform provisions were also included. The bill would add an opt-in fee for project sponsors seeking federal NEPA review, including for oil, gas, coal, and mineral projects pursuing permits on federal lands. The fee would allow sponsors to pay 125% of anticipated costs of the environmental review, limiting environmental assessments to six months and environmental impact statements to one year. The fee would also make review assessments and statements exempt from administrative or judicial review, preventing advocates from challenging key elements of permitting decisions in court.  

Proponents have claimed that the provision would streamline the permit process and generate $1 billion in additional revenue, while critics have described the provision as a pay-for-play scheme, limiting the ability of the public to challenge projects that may have outsized, but under-reviewed environmental impacts. 

Several of the provisions above include substantive policy proposals with seemingly “merely incidental” budgetary impacts, meaning that they could be outside the bounds of what is allowed by the Byrd Rule. It is possible, if not likely, that much of what passed the House Natural Resources committee will be heavily scrutinized on the Senate side to meet the 51-vote threshold. The TRCP is closely monitoring these bills and will ensure that hunters and anglers have a seat at the table to speak up for conservation and access. 

In the face of gridlock, conservation is, and should be, a shared priority regardless of party affiliation or ideology. TRCP is your resource for all things conservation. In our weekly Roosevelt Report, you’ll receive the latest news on budget reconciliation as well as emerging habitat threats, legislation and proposals on the move, public land access solutions we’re spearheading, and opportunities for hunters and anglers to take action. Sign up now


Hunters and anglers have always been the unsung heroes of conservation in America, quietly paying it forward every time we buy a license, a box of ammo, or a tank of boat fuel. We know you’re not satisfied with simply going hunting or fishing and then going home—so go the extra distance. You can take action on the conservation issues that matter right now. Click here to get started.

HOW YOU CAN HELP

TRCP has partnered with Afuera Coffee Co. to further our commitment to conservation. $4 from each bag is donated to the TRCP, to help continue our efforts of safeguarding critical habitats, productive hunting grounds, and favorite fishing holes for future generations.

Learn More
Subscribe

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!