Kristyn Brady

September 7, 2017

A Confirmed Decline in Hunter Participation Should Be a Call to Action for Sportsmen

It’s time for our community and decision makers to get serious about R3 efforts, adequate conservation funding, and smart policies that enhance hunters’ opportunities afield

A new report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shows that 101.6 million Americans participated in wildlife-related outdoor recreation last year. Unfortunately, while the number of people participating in fishing and wildlife-watching is up, participation in hunting dropped by about 2 million people to a total of 11.5 million hunters. Total expenditures by hunters also declined 29 percent from 2011 to 2016, from $36.3 billion to $25.6 billion.

This has significant ripple effects on not only the key federal funding models that support conservation of fish and wildlife, but also the base of support for our public lands and thoughtful natural resources policy.

“It is time for our community and our decision makers to get serious about R3, or recruitment, retention, and reactivation of hunters, because the implications for conservation are dire if this trend continues,” says Whit Fosburgh, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.

The report indicates that participation in fishing increased 8 percent since 2011, from 33.1 million anglers to 35.8 million in 2016, and total nationwide spending by anglers was up 2 percent. R3 efforts geared toward fishing and boating have been successful thanks to a funding provision in the Dingell-Johnson Act, also called the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act, that allows a small percentage of these excise tax revenues to be used for recruitment and retention programs.

The Pittman-Robertson Act, which created the excise tax on guns, ammunition, and archery equipment, does not permit using the funds for R3 activities.

“We must modernize the Pittman-Robertson Act so we can promote hunting the same way we promote fishing and boating, bring the hunter education and licensing systems into the 21st century, and immediately address serious threats to hunting, like chronic wasting disease in deer,” says Fosburgh. “We must also focus on expanding access and improving the quality of the hunting experience—better habitat means more animals and more opportunities for success.”

Decision makers should further support the future of America’s hunting traditions by passing a fiscal year 2018 budget deal with robust funding for conservation and crafting a 2018 Farm Bill that not only enhances conservation tools for private lands but also incentivizes private landowners to enroll acres in voluntary public access programs. It is more critical than ever that sportsmen and women continue to be engaged in the public process of planning for management on America’s multiple-use public lands, as well.

It appears the USFWS will update this page with preliminary findings on the latest five-year report.

Top photo by Tim Donovan at Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission via Flickr

19 Responses to “A Confirmed Decline in Hunter Participation Should Be a Call to Action for Sportsmen”

  1. We must modernize the Pittman-Robertson Act so we can promote hunting the same way we promote fishing and boating, bring the hunter education and licensing systems into the 21st century. Yup, I agree whole heartedly. And while we are at it, spend some money on Chronic Wasting Disease.

  2. Matthew J Van Camp

    Opening up access by providing funds to aid in the policing of public and private lands, investigating infractions of dumping, trespassing, and vandalism of properties through expanded use of camouflaged trail-cams, drone-based surveillance, and road and foot patrols in especially high-use areas, and higher fines and even jail time for lawbreakers would make landowners, especially large timber companies and farmers, allow more access to their lands for game management professionals. hunters and harvesters.
    Education, of not only hunting license holders but also the general public, of the many benefits that hunting and the services that hunting license sales provide through the Pittman-Robertson Act would increase a positive attitude towards hunters and also likely increase recruitment of new people, in addition to an increase in returning hunters, to the field due to better hunting opportunities.
    Lastly, the Pittman-Robertson Act should be modified to replicate a funding provision in the Dingell-Johnson Act, also called the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act, that allows a small percentage of these excise tax revenues to be used for recruitment and retention programs for future generations of hunters!

    • MACK H WILLIAMS

      I am 68 years hunted til 66 gave it up it has become a rich man’s sport.land leases have got out of hand
      Along with poor hunting on what is available UFW is so recristive along with game lands no one wants to use them.fishing an boating is easy for outdoorsman to do (NO POSTED SIGNS no land leases.

  3. Cissy Grigsby

    We need more wildlife management to insure healthy hunts, more active precipitation in both field and stream to actively replenish our lands and rivers! Our wildlife teams have a hard job, an important job every day, to make quality of life better for each and everyone of us!

  4. Wrong approach TRCP. Rather than focusing on recruitment/retention of hunters (which is unlikely to yield much fruit) we should be focusing on reforming these outdated funding models and broadening the conservation funding base.

  5. My most successful method of turning people on to hunting, is simply by recommending hunters saftey courses for their own knowledge and saftey around firearms, without the foremention of hunting with. The prospect of hunting can be introduced after they feel comfortable around fire arms. Have converted a few this way!

  6. Thomas Doyle

    The greatest issue that I have found is a lack of safe hunting grounds within a reasonable distance from home. The areas that I used to hunt are now surrounded by homes. Even though I use a shotgun I am still afraid of having shot land somewhere it shouldn’t.
    In southern Michigan the only lands available are state lands and even though the state DNR is trying to bring back the pheasant population the hunting usually turns into an unrewarding long walk.
    I believe that a greater effort needs to be made to introduce the youths to hunting if you want to bring hunting back and then there needs to be something to hunt besides deer.

  7. Jonathan (Bud) Snow

    Some years ago, I attended a meeting in Middlebury which was hosted by Vermont’s Department of Fish & Wildlife. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the results of the previous years deer hunting seasons along with the management plan effort proposed for future seasons. There were many ideas discussed, and opinions shared by hunters, landowners, etc. mainly relating to the herd. I had an opportunity to speak and saw a chance to bring attention to a situation I had noticed, that being very few young people hunting for deer after opening weekend. It seemed they had lost interest and were off doing other things. A department representative asked for my suggestion to change the situation. So (while a warden took notes) I suggested giving one day for kids under fifteen years of age to hunt deer. They should be accompanied by an unarmed adult mentor or parent. The day should be a week or two prior to the opening day of the regular deer season. I reasoned that if they could see a deer when it was not on full alert, and could possibly harvest one, they would be apt to get interested in hunting. Taking a deer of either sex would be allowed to accommodate management practices being proposed. My suggestion was well received by the Department and Vermont had its first Youth Deer hunting day the following year. It has since evolved into allowing a full weekend instead of just one day. Eventually, Vermont adopted a similar weekend for hunting turkeys. I have heard mostly positive remarks from parents sharing quality time with their children. Only on rare occasions do I hear any complaints about youth hunting putting deer on guard. At this time, we have too much posted property in Vermont and that alone impacts numbers of hunters purchasing licenses. Any place in need of young hunters should consider implementing a youth weekend. Check with Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department for information.

  8. It’s a travesty, especially in this era of social media, that so few Americans (especially birders, hikers, “non-hunting outdoor enthusiasts”) are aware of the conservation benefits of the Duck Stamp Act, Pittman-Robertson, etc. For this reason, we started “Flyways Waterfowl Experience”, a 501(C)3 museum designed to educate the public about waterfowl science, conservation history and waterfowl art. Located outside Wisconsin’s most popular state park, our objective is to attract hikers and birders into the museum and educate them! (see http://www.duckmuseum.com). The laws are in place. Call us optimistic; more education can only be helpful.

  9. After hunting since childhood (now retired and having hunt mostly with a traditional bow for the past 20 years) I’ve never been more frustrated with the overall game management and hunting situation in my state (Maine). As a ‘seasoned’ hunter that appreciates the opportunity and tries to obey the law there are two primary reasons why hunting, for me at least may soon be put to bed.

    The first is lack of reasonable access to huntable land. Private land is being posted at an alarming rate and landowners are left with nearly complete ‘access control’ over their property which contains game partially payed for by public taxes. It’s no wonder that hunter success can best be measured by those iether owning their own hunting parcels or those paying owners for the ability to access such lands. Public land does exist but is undermanaged for wildlife and overcontrolled by the state…resulting in lower game populations and fewer opportunities for the average hunter. Add the ever-increasing cost of hunting fees/licenses and it’s a recipe for hanging up the gun and bow in favor of other more reasonable and enjoyable pursuits.

    The second reason is the over-complication of game laws and increased restrictions that make it easy for the unscrupulous to take game illegally while making it hard for the honest hunter to even see game, let alone harvest it. Again, this stems from overposting of private land (honest hunters are shut out, illegal hunting happens anyway) and overly strict hunting regulations.

    Unless state game managers incorporate more fairness into how access and rules are managed and promulgated the sport of hunting will end here except for the larger landowners and redneck law breakers…and it’ll happen sooner than later.

  10. I’m in NJ, this year was the first time in over 40 years I did not purchase a bow license. Do to lack of places to hunt and I was away for most of the season. In order to hunt for just a few days left, I would need to purchase a regular license an extended permit that could only be use for a specific zone and a buck permit . “ Really “ $$$ for a few days. This has turned many hunters off in NJ. Almost cheaper to hunt out of state.

  11. jean publiee

    hunting should be totally banned. the population of the united states are not hunters except in very small numbers – about 1% of the us. population. its time all animal species should be protected and funds to protect them should come from all americans. and people who want to protect animals should be the ones making laws on them, not their killers.

  12. Edward B. Moore

    I concur with the post from NJ” NJ should be a battle ground state. US Fish and Wildlife has acquired thousands of acres of once hunt able land. They only allow limited hunting on selected acres of the refuge and for limited species . Trying to get them to open new land is almost impossible ” I have even went Congressional in order to make them open up new hunting areas with little success . The state of NJ department of fish and game is of no help as well” they even put on the game board the Nature Conservancy president who has limited only deer hunts permitted on there land. I am old and my prime days of hunting are cover” good luck” NJ. You will be the first state in the union that will not have hunting.

  13. Hunting has become a rich mans sport. Thanks to the much commercialized tv shows like Mossy Oak, Realtree, and countless others the cost of guns, bows, and camo is stupid expensive now. These land lease companys have driven the cost to have a piece of hunting ground through the roof. Its the hunting industries own fault that hunting is declining due to the expense most now can not afford. As with anything its all about the all mighty dollar and making money. Don’t let them fool you that they care about conservation and getting people and youth introduced to the outdoors its about their bottom line and profit. Its ashamed our beloved sport and tradition got so commercialized. Let there be no doubt about it I blame the made for TV hunters for the majority of the problems we are now having.

  14. The fish and game departments work for the rich liberals who set the prices on your states tags and licenses. The idiot comment about who should make the rules is complete b.s.. That’s like saying let the inmates in prison set the rules and laws for something they know nothing about. Just because you think it is pretty doesn’t give you the right to set it’s future. The reintroduction of wolves has destroyed the ECO system in several states. You can kiss all that wildlife good bye. The herds have been decimated by the wolf. Wolves eat their prey while it is alive. The animal screams with each piece of flesh being torn from its body. Bears and cats kill their prey before they eat it. The timberlands and farmers are poisoning the herds with their pesticides and fertilizers. A third of my state elk herd has been destroyed from hoof root and the rest are being killed by wolves. The cost of tags and licenses is so much only the rich can hunt and fish.
    The other issues stem from the loss of habitat because of the increase in illegal immigrants. They have no money but use all the resources.

    So lack of land to hunt.
    Cost of tags and licenses, parking permits, boat launch, road access has made it for the rich only.
    Tree huggers making laws that have never seen a tree, planted a tree or grew a tree.
    Political idiots making laws in your state that have never been to your state.
    In a couple more years the wolves will have killed all the herds there will be no more hunting at all.

  15. Thomas D.

    I lived in Oregon and the huge problem there is the States hunting license fee’s, the very short seasons for Deer &Elk, the micro-management through small hunting areas with limited tag availability tied to a lottery draw. To “draw” a quality hunting area, you may need to wait 6-10 years between hunts! It’s great if your a bow &arrow hunter but if you shoot a long gun, you are getting ripped off!

    The non-existent hunters are even further jabbed, having to spend $177.00, non-refundable just to be eligible to purchase a draw tag. If you are lucky enough to draw a tag, then you have to pay another $400+ for the permit. I would say, unless your very rich, there are far better places to hunt than Oregon.

  16. Steve Herbert

    If you want more hunters, invite someone to go with you on your next hunting or scouting trip. We have all likely included, or will include our children on these trips, but ask a buddy at work, a neighbor, or a relative to go along. Hunting is a recreational pursuit that has a high barrier in terms of cost and knowledge, so it is our responsibility to do what each of us can do to turn potential hunters into knowledgable sportsmen and women.

  17. Rob H.

    Access to hunting land. I used to hunt a lot when I was a kid, and tried to take it back up as an adult. Simply no good public land to hunt. Surrounded by homes, and I have to read a gigantic manual to know when I can hunt, what weapons I can use, and what’s legal game. Total waste of my time.

Do you have any thoughts on this post?

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Kristyn Brady

August 24, 2017

Hunters and Anglers Want More Than Thin Details on Monument Recommendations

TRCP calls for a public report of findings on 27 national monuments that are overwhelmingly supported by American sportsmen and women

Today, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke submitted a report to President Trump that outlined recommended actions for 27 national monuments, including 11.3 million acres of public land. A summary of the report released by the Department of the Interior is heavy on process and thin on the subject of the actual recommendations, including the number of monuments that might be cut back in size.

“These are our public lands, and the public deserves to know what the administration plans to do with them,” says Whit Fosburgh, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “These recommendations have the potential to impact the future of world-class hunting and fishing on some of America’s finest public lands and set a precedent for the future status of all national monuments, even those created by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906—but we won’t know until the results of this public process are made public.”

Although the report summary states that residents local to some monuments expressed concern over hunting and fishing restrictions, 22 of the 27 monuments reviewed are open to hunting and fishing and a number were created with the active support of sportsmen and women. Of the more than 1.3 million people who commented during the review period, more than 99 percent were in favor of keeping national monuments intact.

Similarly, a recent poll commissioned by the TRCP found that 77 percent of Republican and 80 percent of Democratic sportsmen and women support keeping the existing number and size of national monuments available for hunting and fishing.

Now that Zinke’s recommendations have gone to President Trump, sportsmen are anxiously awaiting further detail on the acres affected. Hunters and anglers will also be watching the White House. No president has ever attempted to eliminate a monument through executive action, and no president of the modern era has attempted to drastically reduce the size of a monument.

“We ask that President Trump support the legacy of sixteen past presidents from both sides of the aisle—eight Republicans and eight Democrats—by rejecting any proposal to shrink or undo any national monument through executive action,” says Fosburgh. “The future of some of America’s finest landscapes is directly tied to the health of the $887-billion outdoor recreation economy, and with a major focus on jobs, the White House would do well to recognize how these public lands serve local communities as they are currently managed.”

Guest blogger Debbie Hanson

August 14, 2017

Five Things Your Fishing License Does for Conservation While You Catch Fish

These are your license dollars at work for fish habitat, water quality, and the next generation of anglers

When you’re buying or renewing your fishing license, you’re probably only thinking about the possibility of the new season or exploring a promising new stretch of river. But are you aware of just how hard your fishing license is working on your behalf of your future days on the water?

Here are five examples of how the dollars spent on your fishing licenses, boat registrations, and excise taxes on fishing gear and boat fuel purchases go back to conservation and public access. And at $1.1 billion that’s a sizeable down payment on the next generation of anglers in America.

Improving Fishing and Boating Access

First, funds from license sales go toward fishing and boating access projects. One example is the Ramps & Pier Program in Mississippi, which helps pay for repairs to existing access points and the construction of four to six new boat ramps each year. The state of Oregon also has an excellent model of involving state and federal agencies in adding and upgrading new boating facilities.

Enhancing Water Quality

Boat registration funds help implement clean water projects that benefit fish habitat and improve the experience of anglers and boaters. The Clean Vessel Act program in Hawaii, for example, helped use these funds to construct a new sewage pump-out station and three new floating restrooms at the Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor—all in an effort to protect the sparkling turquoise waters of Hawaii for future generations.

 

Maintaining Fish Habitat

The excise taxes on your fishing gear go toward fisheries maintenance projects that help manage our state sport fisheries. For example, in New York State, biologists collect data through creel surveys and work to restore fish habitat for native brookies, American shad, river herring, and striped bass largely thanks to the taxes paid by the manufacturers of your fishing rods, reels, lures, baits, and flies. In Massachusetts, these funds are used to map fish habitat with GPS technology, sonar, and underwater vehicles through the state’s Fisheries Habitat Program. The more these experts learn, the better prepared they are to spot habitat issues and plan for improvements.

 

 

Teaching and Recruiting New Anglers

Fishing license funds also go to work for educational and recruitment programs that introduce new anglers to the sport. As more people take up fishing, there is a greater need for education on topics like species identification, conservation, regulations, and proper catch-and-release techniques. The state of Texas offers free workshops for first-timers or anyone who wants a refresher on the basics, and the saltwater angler education programs hosted by the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries have been so successful that they hope to extend courses to all coastal areas of the state.

 

Planning for Long-Term Conservation

With an eye toward investing in our marine and freshwaters resources, as well as the next generation of anglers, fishing license fees support long-term conservation plans for our rivers and streams. This robust funding, which has nothing to do with the federal balance sheet, is critical to ensuring an adequate quantity and quality of water to maintain the natural balance of aquatic ecosystems. Texas has used this money to fund its River Studies Program that addresses long-term water development, water planning, and water quality issues.

 

Whether state agencies are studying rainbow trout populations or repairing boat ramps, your license fees are put to excellent use. Want to get started on your next fishing trip and give back to conservation?  Buy or renew your license here.

Sportsmen and women have a long history of giving back to conservation through our purchases. Read about the federal program responsible for that funding model and the hunters in one Western state who wholeheartedly supported raising license fees earlier this year to do even more for fish and wildlife.

TakeMeFishing.org contributor Debbie Hanson is an outdoor writer and avid angler who has written articles on fishing and boating for publications such as USA Today Hunt & Fish and Game & Fish Magazine. She is a member of the Florida Outdoor Writers Association. Read her blogs at takemefishing.org/blog and visit her personal blog at shefishes2.com.

Photos courtesy of Canstock Photo.

Travis Cooke

August 8, 2017

A Flood-Prone County in N.Y. Needed a Healthier River, Not Just Road Repairs

One example of how natural infrastructure—beyond the bridges and highways we tend to picture—helped improve public safety for future floods and give a boost to a legendary trout fishery

Situated along the Pennsylvania border in the western foothills of the Catskills, Sands Creek is one of the most critical trout spawning tributaries in the Upper Delaware River watershed. The creek feeds into the West Branch of the Upper Delaware in the village of Hancock, where the downtown overlooks the confluence of East and West branches. This is also one of the most frequently flooded counties in the nation. Anglers are drawn to the Upper Delaware because of its feisty population of wild brown and rainbow trout and legendary mayfly and caddis hatches.

This is a place where sportsmen and women have been a part of achieving a mindset shift around infrastructure: Beyond roads, bridges, and airports, natural infrastructure—as simple and cost-effective as strategically placed boulders—has re-shaped the Upper Delaware so that it’s safer and more flood-resilient, while enhancing fish habitat and sportsmen’s access.

Here’s how the community came together and why lawmakers should broaden the scope of what they consider to be critical infrastructure.

A wild brown trout caught in the West Branch of the Upper Delaware, just below Sands Creek. Photo by Friends of the Upper Delaware River.
When It Rains, It Floods

New York’s Delaware County, home to Sands Creek, is no stranger to rising waters: The county has had more federal flood emergency declarations than any other in the state, and it is among the most frequently flooded counties in the nation. A devastating flood in 2006, the third in as many years, actually washed away much of the basic infrastructure in the region. In 2011, the one-two punch of Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee spurred conservation groups and local government officials into action, not just to rebuild washed out roads, but to revamp the river so that future floods wouldn’t have the same negative impacts.

“Those storms really changed the way people think about floods,” says Jeff Skelding, executive director of the Friends of the Upper Delaware River. “As a fisherman who grew up on the Delaware, I knew we had to get creative in preparing for floods if we wanted to preserve the river for future generations.”

Enter FUDR and a host of collaborative conservation partners and government officials.

Along with Trout Unlimited, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and officials from Hancock and Delaware County, as well as outdoor recreation businesses like Orvis and Patagonia, FUDR worked to set the Sands Creek restoration project in motion. Beginning in 2012 and completed last year, the project has returned roughly one-tenth of the creek to a near-natural state with the help of local engineers and contractors.

A restored flood plain (left) after removal of a manmade berm alongside Sands Creek in Delaware County, New York. Photo by Friends of the Upper Delaware River.
Building Blocks: Boulder Clusters and Log Toes

The crew installed several natural infrastructure components to restore flood plains, fortify stream banks, and enhance fish habitat.

Carefully placed boulder clusters now help prevent river-altering gravel and sediment erosion and boost water quality for downstream communities, while the rocky surfaces have become prime areas for trout to spawn. In a love story for the ages, these boulders were coupled with nearby clusters of logs that provided instream cover and organic material for spawning fish. Together, these log and boulder clusters dramatically improve river health and make for great fishing holes.

Another structure called a roughened log toe, formed by placing multiple logs with their roots intact in a bend in the creek, has helped protect the banks from high-speed floodwaters. By absorbing the impact of rushing high water, roughened log toes prevent mass erosion, which is critically important along roadsides. Over time, the water churning against the root wads will also create cool, shady areas for fish to congregate.

“These guys were used to taking logs out of the water, and here we are asking them to put these logs in the water,” Skelding laughs. “It really is a new way of thinking about mitigating flood damages and protecting fish habitat.”

The next time Delaware County has a flood emergency, residents along Sands Creek can rest assured that their community is more resilient than in previous years while local anglers might even be able to wet a line much sooner. Not bad for pushing some boulders and logs around. And with an all-in project cost of about $300,000, these benefits came at a steep discount compared to many traditional infrastructure options.

Toe wood is installed along Sands Creek, which will absorb high-velocity floodwaters and create fish habitat. Photo by Friends of the Upper Delaware River.
Today, Sands Creek—Tomorrow, the Mississippi

The success of the Sands Creek restoration project highlights the importance of collaboration in conservation, and sportsmen and women played a crucial role in this case. We think this is an important story because, as policymakers consider upgrading our nation’s infrastructure, it is imperative that natural infrastructure solutions, extending from erosion control to wildlife crossing structures, are part of the discussion.

Incorporating these ideas early on can help save money that would have been spent cleaning up a disastrous flood, plus the benefits to wildlife habitat and river access mean anglers can keep doing what we love – all of which boosts local economies.

When conservationists engage with government officials and local businesses to build better rivers, not just new bridges and roads, the benefits can flow far, far downstream.

Want to hear more about re-engineering a river? Click here to hear Jeff Skelding discuss FUDR’s work on the Orvis Fly Fishing Guide Podcast with Tom Rosenbauer.

Top photo by Garth Lenz.

Julia Peebles

August 3, 2017

Congress Wants to Boost Renewables and Fund Conservation

A bill moving through the House could create a rare win-win scenario for energy and wildlife

The Trump administration and Republican leadership in Congress have an aggressive agenda for the next few years: To reform the tax code, balance a federal budget, increase funds to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border, and pass a one-trillion-dollar package that addresses America’s crumbling infrastructure while providing stability for rural communities. The infrastructure package is going to be decorated like a Christmas tree with bills and amendments, but some ornaments will light up more than others.

One of these may be the Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act, which unanimously passed out of the House Natural Resources Committee last week. The bill, which was introduced by Congressman Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) and co-sponsored by 38 representatives from both sides of the aisle, would promote economic growth in the energy development sector while providing for conservation from a portion of the leasing revenues.

Here’s How PLREDA Would Work

The bill would achieve a win-win scenario by thoughtfully balancing renewable energy development and habitat needs through a robust permitting system and creating a consistent stream of revenue to fund essential fish and wildlife management projects in proximity to renewable energy projects.

PLREDA would boost the incentive for local stakeholders to support renewable energy projects, because 25 percent of the leasing revenues would go back to counties and states. Another 25 percent of leasing revenues would be dedicated to a fish and wildlife conservation fund, the Renewable Resource Conservation Fund. These funds could help open up access to public lands, enhance clean water resources, and improve habitat for elk, wild trout, mule deer, sage grouse, and other important game species.

TRCP strongly supports this bipartisan bill, which illustrates a balanced, common-sense approach to energy development on public lands. At a time when lawmakers have many legislative priorities, it’s heartening to see investments in America’s infrastructure and economic health that also create new revenue streams for conservation.

Learn More

Want to hear the latest on PLREDA and other legislation that could affect the places where you hunt and fish? Become a TRCP member (it’s free) and we’ll keep you informed.

Top photo by BLM/Flickr.

HOW YOU CAN HELP

WHAT WILL FEWER HUNTERS MEAN FOR CONSERVATION?

The precipitous drop in hunter participation should be a call to action for all sportsmen and women, because it will have a significant ripple effect on key conservation funding models.

Learn More
Subscribe

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

You have Successfully Subscribed!